oh look at that - not even checks notes 3 months in and they’ve already broken their event cycle. Somehow, not even surprised
1 Like
If only there would be a way to get more players into a mode, maybe fix the issues with it or something idk
But yeah, naval not being played much is 100% gaijins fault because of the bad decisions with the balancing and maps in that mode
1 Like
Strv 122B+ commander view blocked, it’s been over 7 months and this still hasn’t been fixed.
This bug has already been reported, but nothing has been done.
10 Likes
Why is Gaijin so afraid of letting the playerbase progress at a realistic pace?.. WTF… 🤦♂️
3 Likes
Money
3 Likes
Thank you, very nice to see comments from the CM’s!
Regarding the research boost, sad that it is postponed. But understandable.
Re. internal modules:
Does the respective modules affect repair times and funtionality? E.g. if the LWR gets destroyed the LWR doesnt function until its repaired, or the commander sight doesnt function if destroyed.
Re. separation of battle ratings
Why does this arrive for a few vehicles at first? Isnt this something that is statistics based, like the regular BR adjustments? Wouldnt it be most sensible to add it to all vehicles at once?
2 Likes
I didn’t say the Vickers Mk.7 got L27A1? I said Mk.7 kills 2S38s just fine. L26 and L27A1 are basically identical except from the penetrator being a literal millimeter and a bit wider with L26, any kill shot with L26 would be a kill shot with L27A1
Only 2S38 will get extra modules?
First of all I think its just a placeholder. BUT: If we will see following aircrafts these would be: a new F-16, F-15C, F-14D and the F/A-18 Legacy Hornet . Dont expect things to come to early. Sadly we´ll probably dont see the F-14D.
1 Like
2S38 will be one of the first, but it should roll out to pretty much everything eventually
2 Likes
I dont think it will act like a starfighter at all. The turnrate nerf is going to be at the expense of energy retention and not turning radius.
The MiG-23ML series are lucky enough to have a very good missile kit aswell as exceptional performance. I think they will remain solid planes, a lot of their flight performance came not only from their energy retention, but from their very high TWR and top speed, which they should still have. Sure, the turnrate nerf sounds substantial and they might become mediocre dogfighters, but flight performance is not all about dogfights. I think we might see the MLA become better than the MLD since the MLA, lacking wing-slats, bled a bit less speed than the MLD and often times left me thinking it could do with a bit more speed bleed/AoA honestly.
The MiG-23M and MF however do not have such a good kit. The gap between the R-23s and the R-24s is fairly massive and the countermeasures are significantly more limited. It also lacks an ACM mode. On top of this, the flight performance is also worse than the ML series due to a weaker engine. It always felt like the gulf between the MiG-23M and MiG-23MLD should be 0.7BR, and I think the MiG-23M will be very uncomfortable to play if its turnrate is nerfed. It could easily be 10.7 even with the R-60Ms. The Su-22M3 retains speed very well and has 6 of them at 10.7. Sure, the Su-22M3 has its flaws, but I rest my case.
Only a few existing tanks and all new tanks introduced from this point forward. They will add more modules to other vehicles down the line.
2 Likes
Despite the fact there may be some not so good news in sections of this, this is a wonderful post and I hope to see more like it in the future!
I absolutely love transparency from the games I play, and this post was definitely reassuring about the games future in this kinda stale time. Hope to see more like it, and thanks for keeping us updated! <3
2 Likes
I hope so, since there’s a lot of vehicles with that kind of issue, specially WMA301, PTL02, SANTAL, MEPHISTO and AFT09. At least from what I can remember from experience.
1 Like
Very excited to see what changes will be made here. Upper tier Air RB needs some love.
Thanks for listening.
1 Like
it seem they have model a firewall after the fuel tank, maybe it will generate spall
But I really loved all the detailed internal building, it would help a lot to understand how the vehicle works, something that could I should be in all vehicles or in most of them that have bunch of automatic functions like 2S38.
2 Likes
probably won’t help with everything to be completely honest. Some things are just very empty IRL, (mostly the APC conversions, think WMA301/PTL02), but should deffo help with a lot of the dedicated LTs and SPAAs eating shots
Those modules looks epic i love this kind of small things ,t should be a standard and we will get every patch minimum of 5 detailed vehicles,not like those spall liners where only few got it and thats all.
Incredibly underappreciated aspect, since most only have seen the exterior.
1 Like