Yea. The only thing they have is a slightly good mobility, which is just only slightly good and in reality does nothing to
According to Western standards, ZTP98 is a 1:1 replica of the 2A46 from several decades ago. Therefore, the loading mechanism is also a 1:1 replica and has not undergone any improvements.
Because, again, it’s a balancing feature, it’s not accurate; as I mentioned earlier every autoloaded and manual loaded vehicle has their reload speeds tied to a balance, it’s not accurate at all. Even if Gaijin added the M-84 tomorrow for example, it’s very likely that its reload speed won’t be faster than 6,5-seconds long.
I want accurate values just like the next guy, throwing this fault on me or whoever says fact or the real thing is nonsense and won’t bring the changes you want, however it’s a balancing situation. When the T58 heavy tank was announced people showed documents about its reload speed and guess what? It’s not accurate at all in-game, it’s a few seconds slower than the vehicle could perform in real life.
Which is the case, it’s a balancing feature. Yes I agree that there need some vehicles that deserves changes for good or bad, and reload speed could be a key factor, and as I said, not only Chinese main battle tanks but every other autoloaded vehicle could have, what I mean is equal treatment, this is not a matter to please a certain part of the community, this is a matter to please the entire community.
I guess Gaijin disagrees with you
I think there’s a little bit of a skill issue happening here, especially when if you look at overall winrates for nations at top tier, China continues to perform pretty well, and Russia (especially MBTs) have been doing exceptionally poorly.
The reload should not be an issue when you have good mobility, being able to duck in and out of fights, unless you are pushing head-on in your Al-Khalid and getting less than 0.5k/d, because that’s not the playstyle that China has.
That’s because of general player skill. It does not show how strong the vehicles are