What could have been.
4 Likes
Honestly would have made more sense than what they have now
3 Likes
Both are currently in the only trees where they belong
Yes I know, that’s why I edited the British tech tree. :)
- No one has requested the addition of new American-made tanks to the Chinese tech tree. The so-called “high demand” is entirely a figment of Gaijin’s imagination.
2.In fact, it is completely correct to oppose the inclusion of VT4 in Japan, as VT4 belongs to Thailand, not Japan.
3.Finally, to provoke Chinese players, they created a brand-new VT4 model with a higher loader position, offering better protection than the previous VT4A1. Clearly, this model was intended for the rumored Japanese VT4, but due to pressure, they placed it in the Chinese tech tree. The most ridiculous part, however, is that they forgot to update the internal structure of the VT4A1.
6 Likes
Too late:
This suggestion was already passed to developers for consideration.
I am part of the American playerbase, and I will not boycott it as long as the Thai VT-4 is added to Japan’s Thai subtree in the future, when it’s finally the appropriate time to introduce both in the same update together.
VT-4 was never coming to Japan anyway, it was only ever leaked for Thailand and PRC.
VT-4 was not put anywhere due to pressure.
1 Like
If adding the m1a2T is what it takes for Gaijin to finally add Sepv3 to the US that’s 2 years overdue I’m willing to bite the bullet, even though I don’t agree with it, especially after what the Chinese community did with the VT-4 for Japan I personally believe they don’t deserve it after that. But on the other hand if its added the m1a2T is nothing special really, it’s essentially an m1a1aim with a Crows and M829A1(KEW-2)
1 Like
“Republic Of China is not China.”(๑╹ヮ╹๑)ﾉ
Humour me.
2 Likes
Greyhound for the US tree. Soon please!
I can’t see what you changed, everything is at it should be here.
1 Like
I want the Aussie Abrams in the British tree.
I want Abrams in Chinese tree.
If they can spam Leopard 2 into every tree, they can do the same with Abrams. As China you can already play F-16s, Mirages, M60s, all sorts of American (and French for the Mirage) designed hardware due to Taiwan. This is no difference.
4 Likes
The Taiwanese need it not the Chinese. How are you going to attack them when most of them don’t want the Abrams anyways…?
I meant by by Gaijin, not the players. Just like what happened with VT-4 for Japan and then it got withdrawn because of the Chinese playerbase backlash - if we get a devblog teasing M1A2T for China and Americans get upset I’ll support them. Let’s keep it consistent and fair.
2 Likes
And thankfully hasn’t happened.
Taiwan isn’t china, lol.
1 Like
It the true China… but anyways it deserver the Abrams T.
It really doesn’t. Both doesn’t need it and doesn’t deserve it. Chinese MBTs are a weird mix between soviet and western ones, that’s unique. Should stay this way.
2 Likes
Ye but the tree should be build for the ROC not the PRC you know? Like we can’t kick out the guy who actually owns the TT.
Their government is literally called the Republic of China