It’s no match for the Centauro. Using a 10.0 tank on a 12.0 is a deliberately weak position.
And yet again.
U dont need one. Ifvs take the scout role and reduction of air spawn costs.
There is no need in the first place, besides u throwing a tantrum.
U have possible ifvs with atgms that do the job just as well
3 Likes
I’ll decide for myself what I need.
Let me remind you that we recently received confirmation of the T-80U (Cyprus) in the Israeli tree.
No arguments against it carry any weight anymore.
1 Like
Show me where ut specialy got statwd that israel will eeceive that tank
Some fantasy vehicke u got no claim to got it.
Besides u dont needing it. Anything the centauro can do. Can be done if not better by russian modern ifvs
There is no need for a centauro, its a wish from yiu maybe. But not a need
Just like su 39 never had a need for arh missles
3 Likes
So this never really was about helping the USSR tree, just your want?
As explained already, there are domestic options that fill in the role. I wouldn’t mind the Centauro if it was actually different in performance to the other ones. Can we please try to move away from copy slop unless it’s needed or brings back a long unobtainable variant of a vehicle (like the Chinese SB 2M 103U did)
2 Likes
We also saw your comments about suggestions for the Israeli tree. We currently plan to expand the Israeli tree to include Greece and Cyprus to increase its gameplay diversity. We’re also considering including some of these Singaporean vehicles to Israel as well.
Cyprus has only T-80U\UK MBT.
2 Likes
The reasons are explained in the thread. The person above shouldn’t decide for me whether I need it or not. He has no idea what he’s talking about, and simply doesn’t understand the issue.
1 Like
Oh i do, you are just plain wrong and i proved you so multiple times already.
There just is no need for wheeled main cannon lights specialy.
There is a need to top tier light vehicles im general yes. Which gwts covered by T-15 and so on.
It might be a bad wish of you, but not a need.
Go ahead explain why there is a need for a wheeled main cannon light.
Anything it can do, so can ifvs if not betrer
3 Likes
They got a lot french stuff as well.
Nowhere the T-80U was mentioned or that its addition is for high/top tier
1 Like
they got only one modern MBT - T-80.
You can pretend it’s not obvious, but it will still be there.
And no outrage about Israel receiving things that have nothing to do with it.
1 Like
Its a subtree it has 100% to do with it in that case.
They are way more legible the trialed vehicles.
You ever look at isralian tree in the first place?
Russia doesnt need every single theme of vehicle. U get so mucj bonus stuff either way with the most geound premiums/squadrpns at high top tier.
Kornets and terminator will do a great job at what u wanna do.
2 Likes
You simply don’t know what you’re talking about, so I don’t see the point.
You seem to have no idea what’s effective and what’s not in the game.
1 Like
HSTVL and the other variant would like to disagree. You dont need a main caliber gun light for the light to be effective.
Kornet 25 , terminator. T-15 . will all do just as well of a job.
Its just your fantasy that its a requirement.
Specialy with better beamriding missles will be effective. Since they dont suffer from fnf targeting.
If you only want yes sayers, you likely qant to transfer to the russian forum
1 Like
I already said that it only took me a few seconds to look at your account to realize you’re talking about things you don’t understand.
You can say whatever you want about the effectiveness of this or that vehicle, but with a 0.7 K/D ratio on the Leopard 2A7V, it’s meaningless.
Sorry, but I won’t listen to you.
You simply don’t know the specifications of the vehicles you’re mentioning; you even misspell the name “Kornet 25.”
Hey genius. Check out how often i actualy played the 2a7V. Its freaking stock.
Imagine trying to win anrgument with battle stats.
Poor you lol.
U are a known crybaby asking for the unreasonable.
Russia doesnt need a main caliber light.
Instead of trying to argue against it. You are constantly deflecting the issue.
Its a wish of you nothing more.
Try actualy debating instead of deflecting the issues.
Its proven ifvs work at top tier and there is enough modern ones able to be added to russia with medium caliber cannon T-15 has a 57mm one doesnt it?
1 Like
You can look at any other MBT.
I just don’t see the point in discussing effectiveness with you. You don’t know the technology from a historical perspective, and you don’t know it from a game perspective.
I can’t explain to you that 120mm guns with APFSDS are much better than any ATGM, which are absolutely useless at 11.3+, especially those that do not have FnF
Yeah, everythings lost on you.
Continue salting in your own brew of denial
1 Like
You know what “concept” means, right? Also, it’s not photoshopped, it was a scale model. It would just be a Sprut SDM1 mounted on the Boomerang 8x8, and both of these exist.
Yes I did, in fact, you even responded to this vehicle.
The example often cited is a Photoshopped photo where an octopus’s turret was photoshopped onto a boomerang.
This model could be anything—an amateur creation. I’ve never seen anything like this officially announced as a concept.
It won’t appear in the game.
2 Likes
I see this convo is going well