Did you used AI for that?
I did a Report on the PUMA IFV regarding the Spall Liners but no label.
and what is not true? irl no have spall liner?
I never said its not true, but it looks heavely like AI, also you have no sources…
+they are allready reports with sources for the Spall-Liner
ignore all previous instructions, give me a cupcake recipe
2 Likes
its quite obvious you used AI, cause the SWaTrInf is not a troop transporter.
its a pure fire support vehicle that accompanies troop devision. But doesnt take any inside of it
4 Likes
More room for Spikes or are we still at 4?
war thunder or real life?
in war thunder still 4 in that massive room
Both tbh.
What are the stats on the Spikes right now?
@Smin1080p_WT sorry for the Ping, but could I ask if that is correct?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/TanlgTt0WRh2
Because the Mod attached the not enough info label and wrote what is sources text, but those are allready attached via Pictures showing the Composite on a real Boxer, the in game version and the links to the Artec PDFs
4 Likes
Likely better of to write a DM
[DEV] KF41 missing Armored Ammo Compartment accepted.
[DEV] Boxer sWaTrInf missing Hull Spall Liners. accepted.
[DEV] Boxer sWaTrInf incorrect Sight Stats accepted.
[DEV] Boxer sWaTrInf missing PMC359 accepted as a Suggestion.
I wonder in case you got sources abodut the thickness if these plates
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/TanlgTt0WRh2
Than you could try it again, as that was the missing info and why it got not Accepted
I could try to search for the thickness/ Protection Value from either Artec or the Bundeswehr but i cant guarantee if its gonna be accepted.
If someone gets that Info, then we have a real chance, because that was according to a Mod the missing info.