You have a Picture on Hand with 15km?
If not I could offer Pics
No i dont have screenshots for it rn but i could do some rq
Allready uploaded )))
I will create a new Report again but instead of 40km its for 15km, or i could tell Smin that the claimed LRF Distance isnt really correct (because we know that 2 tanks are not part of the 10km LRF range)
Even 3 tanks )))
2S38
HSTV-L
RDF/LT
So you wanna to redo the report for 15km or talk to smin?
well my previous report for that has been locked and i did ping Smin on the Dev Server Discussion Topic
1 Like
I made a Correction Report regarding the LRF Range on the Boxer.
[DEV] Boxer sWaTrgInf incorrect LRF Range (Correction)
1 Like
Bug Reporting Manager thinks the pressure cartridge on APFSDS rounds detonate with NC propellent when it is clearly presented NC in the event of damage the effected ammunition will just slowly burn off after releasing the pressure from the propellent cartridge, which is stated about 0.09 Bar / 9 kPa.
Mind you this is in the event of a singular 30x173mm propellent cartridge damage, kills the entire crew.
Claiming there is a necessary need to compare sources from IM munitions to standard Black Powder or Nitroglycerin (Double or Triple Base) when it’s provided in the document showing NC does not explode, the remaining propellent just burns off after the primarily pressure release.
It’s clearly shown that it does not cause catastrophic ammo detonation, so I’m more intrigued on how an upwards facing stow ammunition for the 30x173mm round has enough propellent force to enter the tiny hole through the bulkhead and kill all the crew instantly?
Community Bug Reporting System → Not enough info.
2 Likes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/YphlesG5mtep?comment=uAIOs4usqgNcY1cGwlD4Upfs
Well, we should start making bets if this will be properly fixed or as we saw on thr dev
Didn’t the literal interior of the turret show the turret having the same spall material on the inside of it?
You can see it is…There. Not to mention, ARTEC clearly states all their vehicles COMPLETELY cover the crew compartment with spall liner. Are we saying the two guys in the turret aren’t crew now?
Also included in the Mission Systems Armor states under Crew Armor, Protect acc. STANAG 4569, small calibre threats, which is NATO standard for being protected against smaller fragments; Spall Liners- Otherwise the vehicle cannot be certified and accepted by the Bundeswehr.
@Smin1080p_WT Is this enough to add spall liners to to the turret or do we require verbatim “Spall Liner” to be said in documents than technical NATO standard terms? If Its appropriate can someone re-review this?
You can access the NATO 2004 STANAG rating document online with a simple google search to see that this is a basic thing they require for their testing to certify such a rating.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/CRSuLjq0s5rA
Spoiler
1 Like
From what i could read it needs to be written as Spall Liners not NATO standard
The turret cannot legally be listed as in accordance to STANAG 4569 if it doesn’t meet criteria which includes spall lining. Again, STANAG 4569 means it includes protection against small arms fire and fragments, that’s spall liner.
Mission systems armor being in accordance with STANAG 4569 for small calibre means the turrets interior has soft measures that protects against small calibre weapons, fragments and explosions.
Crew Armor is the exterior rating of the armor outside.
I did attempt to explain that the Armor protection concept includes Spall Liners aswell according to Rheinmetall.
I forgot to mention this but Curtis stated that the HWC would be able to stayed stabilized at its full speed, if you would like to put a report in for that.
Currently I believe the stabilizer bounces at full speed?
And yeah I am pretty sure they want it verbatim, technically the Block II is the HWC just with some of exterior turret modifications. Like the pictures alone show the spall liners but I guess physical proof is out the window due to that recent AI missile on the PL-12 I think it was??
Hopefully later we can request an inquiry on spall liners for the LANCE 2.0 two man turret later this year since it is actively developed.
Comparing the HWC turret interior-It definitely uses Curtiss-Wright components.
I’d definitely include this.
1 Like
Sure i could do a report on that part. however i doubt this is going through as it may be a game limitation
The great thing on that is, we can test it )))
Usermission/Look at Datamines
Found it
Sure, we cant use it in reports, bit atleast we know if a Mod would appear and say not possible, game limit, we can start going loud :)
Edit:
Found someone who will try to set it to 100km/h when the Patch drops tomorrow in a Usermodel