Right now it would be hard to add, but once ARH missiles are added, I think we’ll start to see long-range PGMs and cruise missiles become a lot more common in game. P-8 would be really good in Air and Naval RB, though it would struggle somewhat in Ground RB
Ground It will be bullet hell for this Aircraft simple due to how damn large it is.
It’ll be a 5.0 bomber with a modern airliner skin…
Only if you can get at it. it’ll orbit the ground map and drop PGMs from space.
well I say higher because that is unfair for the 5.0 fighters who are in WW2 tanks go against a modern weapon.
I say 7.0-8.0 even 9.0
It can only do 500 kph. Even WWII prop planes can catch it and it would be a sitting duck for anything with missiles.
Yeah but it has flares and chaffes for that and also there is like no crew so it’s a flying paper so it can soake up more bullets and also again to advance to be any where near the WW2 tanks
1 Like
That’s why it doesn’t fit the WT meta. Too weak for air, to OP for ground or naval (until they add advanced SAMs).
hold On naval it’s fine have you seen the aa in the 5.0 naval that shit is scary.
1 Like
I just have problems with it at a 5.0 ground Br
Not if you have standoff AShMs and PGMs like Harpoon etc.
Question what is the AShM
antiship missile
oh yeah but they don’t work that well i have used the douglass and it’s does not do shit.
Did you read the suggestion?
And speed is not the only thing that defines BR, weapons load is also a balancing factor, and the P-8 can carry very modern weapons, with huge ranges on them
1 Like
thats exactly my fucking point thank you
1 Like
it’s payload is to deadly for a 5.0 br
1 Like
Try reading entire thread before posting.
I did, and I refuted your claim that this can only go 500km/h, in addition to pointing out that BR isn’t defined only by speed.
What else do you want me to say lmao
2 Likes
just checked it’s payload it’s all anti-surface and sub weapons.