Boeing F-15EX Eagle II - Sharpening the Bald Eagle's Talons

I was talking flight performance wise. How much heavier would it be tho?

EPAWSSv2 dropped guys

Indeed, it is currently in development and has not yet been flown, however. Here are more details about it:

It seems the changes are focused on both software and hardware, with the most significant improvement being its enhanced processing power. This allows the system to efficiently handle multiple threats simultaneously.

Importantly, it’s noted that the EPAWSSv2 will be available as a retrofit option for most existing F-15 operators.

1 Like

Yeah, I read this one lol.

There was some talk about later EPAWSS getting towed decoy (such as v2), I think the article touched on that as well if I remember correctly.

This leads me to wonder if they will add v1 or v2 to EX since I feel like by the time they add it v2 will be done.

Maybe they will give it a MAWS finally, who knows

2 Likes

Very nice. Maybe this aircraft will receive even more gimmicks making it even better. Who knows?

well just checked, apparently you were right it’s one and a half ton lighter (empty weight)
lighter structure thanks to composites, so it’s lighter despite more equipments
this thing will definitely be a beast in-game

1 Like

Missile truck with the ability to turn. Imagine later batches get the F110-GE-132. That would be about 7000 lbf static thurst more than the 229’s or the 129

1 Like

and fast too, and with good avionics

1 Like

errrhm acthually the F-15EX has F110-GE-129 engines not 132 :nerdemoji:

That’s why i mentioned later batches of it as it COULD (doesn’t mean it will) equip the more powerful 132’s. You’re right. Right now the F-15EX is equipped with the F110-GE-129 that has around the same amount of thrust as the PW-229

1 Like

I’m all for it, but you understand that Gaijin won’t introduce anything newer than the 80s-90s for the US. Otherwise, it could ruin the comfortable game for Russia.

1 Like

Oh they will (When the Su-57 comes making it mostly useless at the Br because it will fight 5th gen aircraft)

1 Like

“RuSsIaN bIaS”
stop repeating the lies that only exsist simply because there are more US mains. I honestly think that we are all stuck in our own echo chamber. Anybody who has played russia(or russian vehicles in other TTs) know that russian bias is simply due to the fact that you have never played russian vehicles(IS-2 ain’t OP when you play it). Truth is, the reason people belive in russian bias is simply because other than US/german mains, the rest of players are likely russian mains which means you are simply more likely to die to russian tank.

1 Like

Why is the Challenger series’ armour so weak then? why is Britain always given equavilent vehicles way after the others get them? Why does France not even have a top tier MBT yet? You are the typical Russian player that says there is no bias and just blames the useless US and German mains for being skill issues and saying it’s Russian bias.

What is the win rate of the USA and Russia in the top tier?

U.S has low win rates mostly because of gaijin. Giving the U.S a premiun every updated is not alright.
Russian bias is over used tho.
The Abrams can use some buffs not nerfs tho.

Anyways. This is an F-15EX thread

1 Like

I’m a Chinese main

Spot on

See China and Japan. No F-2, J-10C etc

3 Likes

At least China has the Temufighter I left Japan out because it isn’t going to get anything and Gaijin has at least been somewhat kind to give it the best 1st Gen F16 in-game that didn’t even exsit and to gave them one of the best SPAAMS in the game

Ah yes, the stupid slandering of the several unique chinese vehicles that exsist that look nothing like other vehicles.
As for the J-10A, you cannot compare it to the eurofighter. Eurofighter is equivalent to J-10B, and I honestly think (and this is gonna be controversial) that the eurofighter being after the J-10A is understandable, considering China has not been given anything unique for a very long time.

Mitsubishi F-2. As much as I like dunking on japan, japan deserves the F-2.

I honestly think the best way to know there is no bias is to play a bit of each tech tree at times. I do main China however I also play US, Germany, Russia, UK and the other TTs(obviously, i have not gotten very far, but I have played them quite a lot). Then you know the snail makes it so all TTs get equal suffering.

Every group of mains WILL inherently be biased to victimize themselves. I hear tonnes of other Chinese mains claim US and Russian Bias, i hear russian mains claim US bias, and US and german mains claim russian bias.

I understand where you are coming from, I also used to claim russian and german bias, but after playing russia and germany occasionally for a while I understand that Bias does not exsist.

1 Like

I call the J10 series the Temufighter

100% agree on that. It can come now but my point is that dening Russian bias is a dumb argument and can be proven wrong pretty easily. That is without mentioning the bad legal things that Gaijin have done

There is a bit of bias for Germany but most of it is dealing with coping German mains

It definitly does. Britain for example has so many vehicles that can be added but instead there are C&P vehicles and subtrees that don’t need to be there but in-game are needed to do many lacking things

1 Like