Light. BMPT is not light tank. That a huuuuuuuge difference
Idk is more or less fun tbh, and idk is this will fix something.
Strange, because the same armor can sometimes protect from nuclear blast, and another time be penetrated by a tank with 9.0 xD
Oni, I’ve defended the BMPT.
Here’s me defending it: So much so that 11.3 is plausible for it without ammunition changes.
@racimazzedine has not defended it outside of wanting it moved up:
Granted, it’s a generally neutral BR suggestion.
But if you were to accuse him of defending the BMPT, that would be the post to use as evidence.
How does BMPT being as OP as EBR once was make them biased?
Are you telling us that Gaijin Entertainment had German and France bias as well when they had similar to identical situations?
You quite literally trashed on @racimazzedine for having this take…
My problem with that is that just seemed to have been used as a work-around to specifically avoid doing that
thank you, i made whole forum since the start of the dev and still people cant see it.
They don’t because they only model the 3 parts of it if you miss one of the modules the rounds pass right through
that for sure, gaijin never does 100% of its suppose job
All autocanon tanks in game are strong, but all have a singluar weakness. They are extremely vulnerable to attack .This is the ONLY way they are even remotely balanced, and even then, some can be extremely strong if they get given the chance. BMPT does not have this vulnerability. In fact it puts more than a few MBTs to shame in this regard.
It facing only tanks that maybe have the firepower necessary to consistantly counter it? yes it would. And it would stop tanks that cannot fight it from even seeing it>
Oh yeah that Tandem ATGM doing work…
Clearly a marketing lie if you expect Tandem charge warheads to work vs ERA
+top attack
A person who goes against any kind of solution, refuses to accept that BMPT points are not being drilled when they should be. They do not contribute anything other than defending an overpowered vehicle and still playing with replays while insinuating the opposite of what an entire community is reporting and evidencing.
I don’t need to prove why X is X. If you want to side with this person, you will be just another one that I will gladly ignore, and I say that everyone here has seen from the beginning that this person appeared in this thread and in OTHERS related to the BMPT vehicle, clearly defending the absurdity that this is just for the sake of destroying an entire BR and others.
I am no expert on this thing, but those who call for a nerf on this vehicle notice this person’s damn sarcasm. And how horrible it is to try to move forward with this type of person getting in the way.
Feel free, if necessary, to invite him over for a glass of vodka while you chat about how the Russia is unfairly treated and the BMPT is weak enough that it didn’t deserve to be upgraded to 10.7.
I love it when my top attack missiles hits the LFP, the tech is amazing
Marketing lie
Something something LMUR
What the heck, God, do I have to try to talk to blind people like this?
Engage the vietnam flashback gif
I don’t mind LMUR being in the game it’s a real serviceable missile and is good for Russia.
Just makes me sad that SPIKE, AKERON and Javelin when they add it cannot reliably do top attack they come in and hit the most armoured part of the tank :(
Yeah, nothing wrong with the LMUR specifically, problem being that’s the only missile that seems to actually function as a top down
Like damn, they can do it for this one, why not the rest
we provided the same solution, yet you act crazy when other than you say, that just double standar sarcasm.
your just keep going with the lies. same can be done with you, going all over the forum as the person who lies more than it can talk.