Weak spots shouldn’t even be an argument, every tank have them.
I could kill the MBPT with a Tiger 1 but does that make it fair ? No.
it’s a better Jaguar and a better Puma so it needs to go higher than these two. Pure logic
1 Like
they can be an argument if the vehicle has more or bigger ones but since the BMPT has the most favorable ones below 12.0 at least its a complete non-argument
yeah, i meant in that case. Ofc you can use them when debating about heavy tanks or mbts
1 Like
Welcome to the Russian Bias Cope simulator lol
1 Like
ammo rack explo kill still work, i dont why you think that but ok.
i had a better experience with 9.3 tanks
Yes it’s standard deflection tactics, i’m not 6 years old fella have been around the block, but i also know OP shiz when i see it, have seen the same thing many many times in many different games, from many different people
well based on the fact in the last 5 matches the amount of BMPTs i have killed via ammo rack is 1 of 4 the others required multiple shots picking off crew, but you can say the ammo can kill it
A panzer IV can kill a Challenger 2
Or just shooting them and nothing happening period lol
hey its a fair match you just gotta aim for weakpoints lol
3 Likes
Yep, sounds perfectly reasonably. If those T-32s complain, its a skill issue
me watching it take 30 plus rounds from the ajax from the side to kill a single BMPT and then watching the same BMPT one shot me from the fron with 30mm APDS lmaooo
3 Likes
Thats why the Arietes are at such a high BR, cant have a weakspot if the entirety of your tank is a weakspot taps head
3 Likes
“No Armor, best Armor”
Then deal with BMPT armor whats an issue here then ?
woosh
Are you aware of this concept called sarcasm?
The terminator is so OP to this BR
1 Like
He claimed it’s and I quote: ‘‘always Russia with OP vehicles’’.
I then provided a long list of non-Russian vehicles which were/are horrendously OP.
Please read context next time.
???
It’s simply a list of non-Russian vehicles, if you believe Russia has had as many OP vehicles as all of those other nations combined, I welcome you to list them off.
Firstly, how convenient that it’s okay for NATO vehicles to be horrendously over-powered, as long as it happened more than a month ago.
Secondly, so when time passes you’ll be fine with the BMPT having been overpowered because by that point it’ll be ‘‘old af’’, right? /s
Thirdly, German KV-1B, F4U-1a and HE-100 are still utterly broken, and have been allowed to dominate entire lobbies for years and years now.
Oh the ignorance.
The massive, towering ignorance.
People spammed videos of them curbstomping entire lobbies with the 8.3 Puma.
People spammed videos of them seal clubbing entire lobbies with the EBR 1954.
People spammed videos of them getting 80%+ winrates with the IPM1/M1/AH-1Z combo.
People spammed videos of them abusing the Mitsubishi T-2.
etc.
etc.
M4A3 105 on release could 1v10.
That’s why I’ve still got a 12 - 1 K/D and 83% winrate with it.
50 - 1 K/D in my F4U-1A.
72 - 1 K/D in my CW-21.
6 - 1 K/D in my PaKpuma.
Seriously, your level of ignorance regarding the utter domination these vehicles afflicted is staggering.
If you have no knowledge of the history of these vehicles, why are you even arguing these points to begin with?
Lemme know how many years it took for the XP-50 to get fixed.
F4U-1a still ain’t fixed.
How many years for the J2M2 to go from 4.3 > 5.0.
P-39N still ain’t fixed.
German KV-1B still ain’t fixed.
Etc.
Etc.
But so far we’ve got a UK main, Israel/German main and a German main complaining that grass is always greener on the other side.
Boy, I wonder if the fact that you’re one-tech tree mains has something to do with the level of ignorance we’re seeing here? /s
3 Likes
No i definitely not.