When it gets apfsds and even then it would probably be 11.3.
1 Like
Hes trynna say you odnt play more than one nation.
When you can see very easily if he checked in the actual ingame stat cards that you do.
says the man with less than an overall 63 percent comparitive rating? be quiet lol
whos monthly stats are even more diabolical lol under 50 percent win rate.
sure ur KD is 1.37 but ur average score is still under 100.
Don’t bring up stats unless yours are a shining example.
You’re also negative with teh BMP2M which is wild considering its one of the best IFVs in game never mind for the BR.
These don’t raise the CRV to be more effective in battle compared to the BMPT anyhow.
Happened multiple times in matches for me too. BMPT, nuke in 5 min, match over
I hit bmpt’s “electronic equipment” but the electronic remote turret works and kills me anyway
3 Likes
At this point, I might just stop playing entirely. Hopefully they actually fix the balance.
4 Likes
on my end, after hitting many bmpt-72s in the turret ammo belt, only was able to kill it once.
3 Likes
In my defence ? I would never bring up their stats if they didn’t make such wild claim and offer nothing else.
And yes , the monthly stats are shit cause I have to spam air to grind , im not an air player. For ground I play one premium vehicle line up. If you can’t read the whole convo then don’t talk to me. You look at stats first before talking about argument. Just clam up
Also IFV in general are hard to play. Sure BMP-2M are strong but that doesn’t mean I have to be perfect in the thing. Bro nitchpicking my stats and somehow still fumble at it. You could have used anything, like how top 10 most played vehicle are all premium. But bro picked the most reddit insult ever. Didn’t expect much from An Pigeon anyway.
Aside from one where I shot his engine out first at range and followed up with a second, they have been so far one taps. It’s too small a sample size still but I’ve also noticed more players go for my horizontal drive + FCS on the tech tree BMPT which pretty much disables you, it’s still iffy on whether they can or will shoot LFP depending on scenario.
Either way, I’m not making a conclusion off that yet anyway, I survived a lot of stuff I shouldn’t have in my Type 90 those games so clearly I wasn’t the one getting gaijined.
if it gets buffed, it would need to be higher still
Pretty easy to explain. The Type90/TKX/Type 10 are mostly empty. A lot of , let just say bad shot, will not generate enough spall to kill any of the crew and Type 90 hull can actually bounce (Can’t be Type 10/TKX despite the JSDF claimed the they should be better than the Type 90 and the thing in game is worse than it predecessor in a lot of aspect).
God forbid Gaijin rebalancing the UK/Ita/Jap top tier tank. They will be adding something to make up for it instead
Oh no, I had stuff like my gun breech tank their rounds etc. without any damage lmao. But in my experience that does happen in any tank sometimes. But you probably aren’t wrong they are empty, I think I survive side shots a lot more.
Well mostly just side shot , at least from my experience playing TKX and Type 10. Really wish they buffed those two so it can actually be worth using over the Type 90. Cause as of now Type 10/TKX are kinda bad
1 Like
I had an SPAA earlier (maybe an OSA?, I cant recall) survive 5 L23A1s, im fairly certain there wasnt a single module left to hit. I hate empty tanks
OSA is oddly survivable yeah. I don’t understand why the missiles don’t explode either whenever I’ve shot them. But the new free SPAAs have overall been great (unless too many spawn as one), I haven’t been this happy my team bothers to actually kill CAS in a long time…
Nah 11.7 only with the APFSDS lol, 10.7-11.0 without.
Let’s sum it up. The BMPT has:
- an extremely low reverse speed
- vulnerable ammunition racks that can even be destroyed by a 12.7mm machine gun
- one of the worst autocannon penetrations for its BR
- it has almost all the same weak spots as all T-series tanks
- average, completely unremarkable forward mobility for its BR
- the same goes for its ATGMs (although the BMP-2M at the same BR has better ones)
- it lacks reconnaissance tools and a UAV (unlike its Chinese counterpart)
However, it does have the following advantages:
- armor (it really has a lot of it)
- the TT version has a larger crew
- high rate of fire for its autocannon
Therefore, if we’re talking about raising its BR by weighing the pros and cons, it definitely shouldn’t be done.
No it doesn’t. They are much smaller in comparison and the side armor is megabuffed.
Armor is far too good for 10.3. Case closed.Don’t defend obviously overpowered vehicles.
4 Likes
Armor is literally this vehicle’s only advantage, and you’re proposing to take that away from it. Don’t you find that idea absurd?
No, the vehicle is extremely overpowered in its current state. I really do not care if it’s “ruined”. They can give it APFSDS on the autocannon and it will be fine at 11.0+ and the armor will still do what its actually supposed to do instead of being practically invincible in lots of scenarios at its current BR.
7 Likes
Gaijin either thinks its proper to put a vehicle that can survive almost all direct shots from the front half hemisphere and kill any ground vehicle within 2 seconds with its autocannons and 9M120 missiles at 10.3, or it just wants to make the Russian Bias situation worse.
Lift it to 11.0+.
1 Like
No problem.
I’m sure 7.7s would also largely benefit from that as those two would only be present in full up tiers.
That dart is barely any better than APDS and it’s armor doesn’t really work against main cannon rounds, seen how Turm III can basically lolpen it.
From this point on, it’s basically disadvantage city for the T-62.
So Gaijin indeed placed an undertiered premium in a TT that isn’t USSR. Shocking.
I did actually.
2 Likes