Definitely. It would completely prevent flat angles from getting eaten. Though with this spaghetti shtfest of a game engine i’m not sure if the game would just blow up or not xd
theyre adding infantry with this same game engine so i think its very possible
1 Like
True.
Yeah, Relikt is very powerful just like Kontakt-5, simulations show that the plates degrade the rods to the point they lose up to 20/40% of their penetration. American tests of M829 vs. Kontakt-5 showed ~95 mm penetration reduction - about 20%, and I don’t remember the details but YouTube simulation of LOSAT vs. Relikt on T-80BVM showed 40% penetration reduction. That is regardless of how much penetration the rod has. ERA should be buffed, but base armor should be nerfed, if I had to simplify things.
Speaking of Oplot, I haven’t seen very well modelled simulations on Nozh/Duplet ERA, but if A. Tarasenko’s articles aren’t lying, Duplet should reduce long rod penetration by 90% thus making Oplot impenetrable first-shot. Sounds mythical, but there aren’t any counter proofs really…
1 Like
The publicly available brochure says this is exclusively for older rounds. I’ll fetch it real quick.
2 Likes
That’s not how you use the armour analysis tool.
3 Likes
I see. Makes sense, they have a penetrator the size of normal WW2 round, just of 25-30 mm caliber. 60% is still great against rods
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
its quite funny how distorted the expectations when playing warthunder vs real life are because like in warthunder we get very sad that something like this doesnt defend against the best rounds in the world but irl theyre quite happy to have it defend against much older rounds which are more common
1 Like
1 Like
that wasnt my image blame the guy i replied to
I know, but you stated that the highlighted area was still a vulnerable zone.
It’s only a vulnerable zone because the angle of the camera is wrong.
I think those rounds are actually becoming quite rare, like, Russia uses 3BM42, which is two-part long-rod, and gets a bit of access to 3BM60. Ukraine - idk, I’ve only seen a video of a guy (Shawshank Redemption on YouTube) showing the older 3BM22 which uses little penetrator, similar to those in size which APCR/APDS projectiles use
1 Like
no it is just a vulnerable zone
yeah theres a lot of irl countries dont always use the most modern rounds that are staples of warthunder top tier, especially in oppositional trials on new stuff
Here’s a better camera angle and showcase how it’s not nearly as vulnerable as your picture makes it out to be.
2 Likes
bro a tanks cannon isnt on level with the hull thats just as bad as you claim mine is
plus you can just turn consider vertical angle off
I also think of this like that: the longer the penetrator, the less it should be affected by ERA, because ERA throwing plates are limited in size, they do make front part of shorter rods (M829, DM33) vulnerable, but I think longest ones (785? mm of DM53, 830 mm of M829A3) would be unaffected, UNLESS we of course use the Nozh/Duplet which is basically a row of explosively formed penetrators (like HEAT) and if we place it within the right angle, we can theoretically make it cut the entire penetrator into pieces. Then the armor would do it’s job in stopping them one by one
I’ve shared this picture only a few minutes ago, clearly you did not bother to read.
So here it is again, please take just a minute of your time to actually read it, as soon as you do that, you’ll understand why the screenshot I took is accurate.
1 Like