No that is a myth slat armor is designed to deform shaped charge preventing froming of penetrating flow that is why in the game most protection is between the rails.
Ah, the typical response…
Also, the ‘Red’ tree was the first that I mained, and when I play it now my glorious Stalinium bounces enemy shots more often than not…
You have negative K/D on anything that goes above T-64 that includes almost all of the Soviet MBTs.
Even hitting the main carousel and making the ammo go up in flames ain’t got anything on the Putinium crew ))))
Also Schroedinger’s blow-out panels in action again, but it’s “not a bug report” according to “”“tech mods”“” (the RU ones at least).
Also funny, BMPTs can just spam Puma(s) to death with HEI belts cus Gaijin refuses to fix anything about the Puma, but they “”“fixed”“” BMPTs DM in seconds when it was realised it can be killed on the dev ))))
Yeah cos you’re wrong bro…
And? Are you expected to be perfect in everything to play and enjoy the game?
Others have opinions too without jumping on the stats wagon to belittle others. This displays what is wrong with many on this forum…
Points of view. Do you also not allow others opinions? Ignorance is not always bliss… So much for positive engagement and discussion.
0.5 K/D doesn’t sound like having a fun in competetive game where you have to destroy enemy vehicle.
I do not think I have ever looked at stats, I’m not sweaty. It is not why I play this game. And I certainly do not profess to be better than others on here.
It’s not about being better than someone it’s about being honest
Yes I do, but your ‘opinion’ in this case is tainted with a belief in Russian Bias (in terms of, I quote
)
which isn’t true and can be explained easily by:
- Poorly aimed shots
- Volumetric
- the games overall jankiness
Such moments happen to all nations yet I do not scream “xyz bias” or Aldolfium/Baguettium/Stalinum/Unclesamium armour when I non pen or the above happens…
Can you highlight the dishonesty?
Having less than 1 K/D in most of Soviet MBTs and claiming they have magical armor.
That does not imply that I am being ‘dishonest’. It was my point of view and opinion. Wether you agree with it or not is your perogative which I will respect. (Even though I did not claim to have a better than 1 K/D as you claimed above).
how many time need for gaijin to balanc bmpt first dm23 no penetrate bmpt side in perfect shot two get shot in turred ammo blowed up and the crew wich sit front of ammo no damage this really interesting… u gett racked for bmpt and hes return the fire while all tanbks in fire gg…
You can’t say it was your personal opinion and build strawman to disproove me same time.
Nothing being built here. I stated my point of view and opinion and at no stage was I dishonest about my abilities. I am not disproving, either - if the stats say that about my K/D about T-64 above, then so be it. Does not take away my enjoyment of playing a game.
Maybe I should buy the BMPT/72 :)
Your medial K/D is 1.5 and same time you claiming Soviet MBT have magical armor while having 0.5 K/D on T-90M and T-80BVM which is dishonest it’s not about having fun or something you claimed that Soviet MBT have magical protection your performance on them shows quite literally opposite.
I do think you need to understand the difference from a ‘point of view’ and ‘dishonesty’ - that is something you have implied that I have not. Picking out stats on two high tier MBT’s is also a bit picky to say the least. But, hey ho - you can have your opinion and I will have mine. Let’s not fill up this topic with anymore idle stuff.
lets put this into perspective, the BMP-T shares the same BR as spike vehicles with 30mm bushmasters, while having better post pen on its sabot, having a much more accurate gun, a higher firerate, and better missles. and thats just about the firepower, for armour its still a T-90M/T72B3 in terms of overall protection, that fact this can even face, let alone is the same BR as any 30mm bushmaster vehicle (let alone slightly higher than the AJAX with that pathetic 40mm) is just a testimate to how bad recent balancing has been
