ADATS used to rip through Russian ERA but now it doesn’t ADATS is a terrible tank hunter and an average SAM
4 Likes
what mean “possible” ?
then i tell you: it’s War thunder. We can start to count vehicles where there is the same problem.
Yes, and no. Missiles and composite armors, is something that WT has programmed in the worst possible way. That game are totally not ready for that. And you see that every day.
I also approve Leopard 2A7 and Strv 122B+ at 13.7, and paper Abrams family at 10.7 :D
Fun fact. It’s happens 5 minutes ago - APFSDS Sabot can kill BMPT xD
Getting ridicilous with the amount of nukes i’ve been seeing lately from people that’s bringing BMPT, BMPT-72 and 2S38, you’d think Gaijin would start noticing a pattern at some point
4 Likes
They do not care about the health of the game, just selling premiums and pandering to Russia
2 Likes
thats the issue sadly, they dont care otherwise the BMPT never would have been added. This also happened when Spall Liners got introduced only on the T90M and Gaijin quickly had to struggle to add it too other tanks because people rightfully lost there marbles.
I said it someone else before and I WILL say it here. Gaijin with there recent changes to balance and premiums will eventually hit a point where in about 1-2 years when those new players get to top tier in other nations will begin to experience the balance issues that plague the game and have done for years and the voices will just get bigger and bigger if left untouched.
Gaijin are simply there own downfall because no competitor exists, you know who else went down that same hole (wargaming) and look how WoT and WoWs has simply killed its self.
3 Likes
They were also going to get R-73 in a vacuum. Aim-9M was only added after people riotted
4 Likes
Yeah i totally forgot about that actually
We need custom servers away from the nonsense of Gaijins decision.
Imagine being able to make your own dynamic campaigns with era appropriate hardware.
As that will never happen the game will fall into decline
Yep. Also cant forget Pantsir being added 3 years before equivalents.
KH-38MT being fictional, and then them adding the Su-34 in the same update they said that Brimstone would be too powerful ebcause it could outrange SPAA without counterplay
The whole mess at top tier naval at the moment, or the issues the SKR-7 has caused for years for coastal.
The list just never ends
9 Likes
You’re playing a 9.0 vehicle. Just go to 9.3 max br. Im doing that for japan with the type 16 and its so fun not seeing any terminators.
The desert warrior 10.0…
4 Likes
You mostly just make a meme out of yourself tbh.
the biggest issue with the BMPT is any map that allows it to hide the hull (which is a lot of maps) because at that point is basically impossible to kill and it can just camp there and shoot you, and even replenish ATGMs (I whole heartedly think they should remove the ammo box from the BMPT)
6 Likes
Every map does this because the game supplies you with dumb teammate corpses to hide behind.
Thinking about it, why is there just a gap between the belt and the breech? it just ends at the trunnion which just seems to decrease the chances of fragments closer to the center from hitting tne ammo + isn’t the breech and barrel supposed to be connected?
Stupid design, survivability buff or am i missing something?
All of the above
1 Like
Naaaaah, it’s fine
Where are you shooting that allows you to one/two shot it?
I understand that perfectly fine if you keep shooting the LFP / Driver Port, but I don’t believe you can easily one-two shot kill it if it hides those weakspots (which isn’t that hard to do considering the turret is so much higher than the driver port / LFP).
11.0 would only make sense if the 30mm belt actually consistently detonated instead of only 1/3 of the time.
If they want to keep that stupid mechanic, then it would genuinely be too good for 11.0 – even with APDS.
11.3 / 11.7 makes the most sense.
Hell, the tech tree BMPT can’t even be penned by the HSTV-L / RDF-LT through the LFP, so you’re forced to shoot the driver port / side a fair number of times before it can be killed.
3 Likes
look like someone made a whole forum on my profile.
Well:
- you cant ammo rack neither TT nor premium BMPT by taking out the belt that immidiately feeds to the guns
- you cant easily disable their firepower since its 2x 30mm breech + 4x ATGM launchers
- on top of that, crewless turret
- you cant overpressure BMPTs with most HE rounds aviable to NATO within BMPT BRs
- on top of all of that, volumetric hell in regards to its armor
- on top of that, spall liners everywhere
- on top of that, TT BMPT has 5 crew members
Like, if T-72B3 hides its hull, its annoying, but ultimately you can still take it out through its turret.
If BMPT hides its hull, youre kinda boned.
And its extremely hard to fully take out BMPTs firepower in the flash second it pushes you, blinds you with dual 30mm burst and takes out your gun and spams its ATGMs at you. And if you survive all of that all BMPT has to do is to keep firing until it squeezes enough shots through weakspots.
If normal tank combat at higher ranks is essentially a good old duel with single shot pistols, then facing BMPT is as if one of the contestants brought M249 SAW to the duel while the other contestant kept the single shot pistol.
“But Beeschurger doesnt BMP-2M do the same?”
Why yes the firepower might be similiar but you can just point and click the BMP-2M; with BMPT you have to look for weakspots under all that suppresive fire aimed at your barrel and good lord do you need be sure your aim is true.
Like shoving BMPTs at 12.0 or so does not inherently fix these issues, they will remain to be absolutely annoying to take out; but it confines them to facing tanks that also give hard time to BMPTs, instead of the one sided stomp were currently having.
12 Likes