Gaijin ultra sekrit HQ:
Yeah bro you don’t got to touch the thing at all, just move it up to only 11.3 br. I can’t believe people are asking us to do more work. What’s next on the to do list? Oh we didn’t finish the boxer? Eh what’s next on the list?
4 Likes
You hate the truth?It has always been like this but this time they didnt even tried to somewhat be subtle about it
1 Like
I never understood where is the bais.
If you could like just tell me where exactly.
I know for kh38mt and lmur but that it
just those two or all HEAT type ammos should lose overpressure?
yet we need to aim for weakspot even at shooting the bmpt from the side and diagonal shots, how thats worse than the average T-series tank
i mean i can name a few “bias this bias that” like 38mt(having no concrete evidence of it actually having such specs and working), lmur loft profile being better than other despite having limited documentation, BMPT(recent), T-xx autoloader eats round(in reality, autoloader doesnt eat shrapnel, when it penetrate the armor the shrapnel would go everywhere, penetrating cover plate, ricochet around and detonate sitting shells(hence the kerbal space program)
on NATO side AMRAAM underperform, abrams hull/model, major NATO tank model, NATO ERA
4 Likes
Namer and Puma still sitting at 11.3 same BR, and insanely less effective as the BMPT. Gaijin needs to get these BRs right and more slower firing NATO 30mms to a lower BR that is more appropriate, not to mention fix the overheat mechanic compared to the 2a42 overheating.
Fix the br of all IFV? too much work
Raise the BMPT by two br steps. Just right.
Most the updates they do somehow tend to benefit more Russia?Isnt that bias?
Plus with this BMPT case,they went all in with russian bias
Its also Spike vs Ataka. The latter one is op, Spike does very little. The whole game is full of this kind of bias. And yes, BMPT’s have a quad launchers for their Atakas… absolutely no possibility to survive, they just spam out their 30mm and four ATGMs and nothing else has a chance. Also Ataka is far too easy to steer. Give it some TOW treatment with wonky steering and missile drop @ launch.
This vehicle and its mechanics are just broken, BR bumps do nothing in this regard. TONE it down.
Yeah…in short russian bias
They could honestly just stop lying about “realism” and clearly say the intend to buff russian vehicles to perform equally if not a little better than their nato counterparts…
They would honestly make themself more believable
1 Like
after this br change wiat for a month and see if the WR is still the same
i reckon it would drop, but BMPT is still broken
What would win? A technologically advanced missile from 2018 or a dumb missile from the 1980s?
The russian one will win, as always^^
1 Like
Legend has it the carousel loader helped propel the first soviet rocket to space………
1 Like
In the right hands yes its good but for the most part ive been fighting stupid people so yeah
(You might want to edit your post, change that word to something that wont get your message deleted and/or yourself muted.)
Let me know what you guys have experienced.
So played USA 11.3 (stock since I had to use 10.7 lineup with 11.3 IMP trash tank shouldn’t be in game) and regardless of nation combinations we steamed role against enemy BMPTs. Top tier 12.7 people were still bringing them and made no effect as we continued winning. Overall, 11.3 BMPT is the BR for it and honestly, it’s probably dead. Had some game with Sweden too and apart from having Russia AND Germany on my team with BMPTs we got steamed rolled. I can say it’s safe to say BMPT is performing below and officially dead.
Note: If you want game stats I can give them but I don’t think it matters.
One of the places i see bias is in AA systems:
Russia got good AA all through the BRs,
and if they lack: they have TDs with proxy nades/missiles , TDs with an active radar to reach those pesky helis others nations have a really hard time to hit.
Ligth tanks with proxy and all sorts of thingies.
And more.
Russia got it ALL against Planes.
Before the US was handed the Stink™ and T77E1 (lol), they had M19A1 and M42 (i used the M16 instead of these two stinkers) that covered until the M163, that’s it, and other nations got the same holes through out the BRs.
THAT’s a clear bias to me.
been like this for years, russia was the leader in terms of CAS or weapons
Mig27s
ka50s
you have the mig15 bis ish at 8.0 with 10kg HE rockets with a ballistics computer
9.3 shilka with igla and so on
1 Like