Right - so your purpose on coming into the thread is to play ‘stat-shame’ to…what…make you feel better?
Do you feel bigger and better now? Good. Glad I could help you with that; it’s free of charge.
Now run along, I’m sure you’ll be able to pat yourself on the back for doing such a good job telling someone on the internet how you’re better than them…
… while still not actually addressing the point of the entire thread.
Don’t worry, I also blame :
So yeah you’re right, it’s not only the fault of russian MBTs. It’s a condensed problem of all the other russian vehicles put together + the artificial/shadow nerfs applied to NATO vehicles as well.
In other words : Russia Thunder
So mostly CAS being problematic, got it.
You posted the stats yourself, and I call out your performance being equal or worse to your MBTs. Reap what you sow.
Whatever makes you feel better - big man!
I like your coping mechanism.
I like the fact that you’ve not even tried to defend the BMPT’s relative performance - so I guess we’re about equal on the coping front are we not? Speaking of which…since we have a War Thunder God among us to show us mere mortals how little we know.
Shall we look at your stats on the BMPT?
“Mostly”
They literrally represent 2 points out of 8 in my list, and there are many more of them lol
Japan is a western nation you forgot that one
Oooh look - somebody has been doing well in the BMPT compared to their MBTs haven’t they?
I wonder why you didn’t share that nugget with us while berating those of us lowly, mere, casuals…
Letting the side down a bit aren’t we?
Anyway - as much as I am awed to be in the presence of such a figure - I’ll leave you to your musings…
Now look at my Abrams or Leos. Instead of selectively choosing what to show :)
Just doing what you were doing brother…
Mb on that.
Then I’ll bid you farewell with no ill will.
Fair enough. But i’ll still explain. RU was my first nation, bought 10.3 at level 45, BVM was my first top tier along with 2A5/6. Went back and fixed my stats in BVM, but rest is kinda unsaveable. Never bothered to touch 2A5/6 again as France has them with better teams.
That’s if you take your list as a gospel.
12.7
I mean, most of those stats are the result of folks buying the premium the same way players buy the click bait.
Or the careless nature of BMPT players in smashing the W key and rushing for a spawn who learned bad habits from when the BMPT was a much lower BR.
Either way, those stats don’t match the reality that most players are reporting when they encounter these things. Folks have taken multiple data sets from 10-20 matches and some how report an almost 80% loss rate against russia with the BMPT being a major player in that result.
The BMPT as is rewards bad player habits by allow spray and pray gameplay while having armor that is substantially better than anyone else who goes against it and has a nasty tendancy to eat the rounds.
It can track and barrel way to easily while, due to is modeling, cannot be barrelled - two guns and two missile racks ensure that it has some way to fire back. If you don’t achieve a disabling first shot or a kill shot, there is usually not time to pull back and reset the engagement - though sometimes that does happen, usually you don’t get that chance.
There is very little in terms of counter play when dealing with these outside of one on one, which is usually not the case as teams tend to run several at a time - and heaven help you if there’s a pack in one space.
Premiums don’t perform worse than TT copies.
Meanwhile their tanks have <55% WR.
Sorry, but I definitely trust millions of games worth of data more than I trust 10-20 games pulled up from somewhere.
An interesting stat analysis would be to pull these players performance in their best vehicles pre BMPT and then post BMPT. Because even if they aren’t using it, the ability of the bmpt to lock down opponents I think has helped even those not using it to perform better.
bmpt is a force multiplier.
