Players can interpret Top Tier however they like. I will continue to use Gaijin’s interpretations which is 12.7 exclusively.
and once again:
1 Like
Jesus Christ, Leopard 2 turret armor definitely makes BMPT jealous bro
Rare battle-damaged look
Live until the end of the match and didn’t die lol defo #1 King of turret protection
This is just wrong, but hey why would you hover over a module in xray to confirm afterall if you can just make shit up instead?
“Exterior Fuel Tanks” do not cause any damage to the crew, modules, etc. if they start burning after being hit, all of BMPT’s fuel-tanks are considered as external.
All of BMPT72’s frontal fuel-tanks are also considered as external, the only exception being the one behind the ammo.
I am sorry that your ability to write a english sentence without giving anyone reading it an immediate aneurysm is lacking, but you quite literally said “speed” which does not directly refer to acceleration.
What are you even on about?
You quite literally, with no room for any interpretation for that statement, said that “72 dont get a power system”, which is flat out false as it does.
1 Like
Top tier is the top in my opinion no “uptiers” 12.7
1 Like
It belongs at 12.7 period. what you have to remember is at 11.7 it will drag every 10.7 premium and alike up because sooooooooo many are playing the BMPT, it will literally create a black hole again in the MM.
The other issue is at 10.7 many tanks still lack ammo to reliably post pen the thing at even shallow angles of attack thanks to relik ERA and a T90M hull eating the majority of the shell.
They also need to imo remove the total bs that heavy ERA does with causing shells to “change direction” as this often leads to further penetration beyond the ERA to be scuffed or again not have enough post pen to get through the hull, spall liner and the total bs fuel tanks that surround the ammo in the bottom. god forbid actual MBTs get fuel tanks that do this cough Abrams.
3 Likes
yeah and the puma no have ammo box to refil atgm…
Speaking of Puma:
Its totally OP /s
6 Likes
why do they look so internal then
according to gaijin and the bmptards, the puma is also very op
Because they are. But gaijin said no :)
1 Like
ah, the usual. They share the same pocket dimension as the ammo
Probably just because they copy & pasted T-90M hull module .blk values, but all T-72’s have it as internal aswell, so idk…
1 Like
Disliked the video because they refuse to fix this bs.
1 Like
LMAO! Posted 3 hours ago 😂 I thought this was going to be from last week/two weeks, but NOPE, they JUST uploaded this 🤣
The comment section is going to be fun 😆
Third nuke today with the BMPT
1 Like
When I just stay in the open with any MBT, I get destroyed rather quickly. This BMPT thing is idiotic.
2 Likes
Ive installed an addon to view dislikes on youtube, just to watch this video haha
1 Like
I am sorry mister, i thought your advance english can at least understand some basic english but thats alright.
Fuels explode. External or internal they can damage your tank. Bmpt get only 2 extinguisher while having
5 flammable tank and atgms and ammo.
Fuels tanks can still kill it slowly, is it the best way ? No
Also the system of the bmpt-72 is more protected than the tt bmpt. So it wont matter for the bmpt-72 as if you shoot it, you kill the tank.
3 Likes
I ask you to please, for once, READ WHAT THIS TEXT TELLS YOU:
You cannot use FPE on external fires and all fuel-tanks on BMPT and BMPT72 are considered external except the singular one behind the ammo on BMPT72.
Reading comprehension of a wet towel ong
All of the ammunition is external except the main stowage for the 30mm ammo, which is what should be a 100% guaranteed kill to begin with if it wasnt for belt-fed vehicles not having had their ammo-bug fixed.
You really do not read at all, did you?
Your statement was and I quote (again)
“72 dont get a power system.”
To which I told you that it is wrong because it does get a power-system.
What is so difficult for you to understand about this?
At which point did I claim that it was a benefit for BMPT-72 to have it not be external?
Correct! Not at any point in this conversation!
Yet you harp on it as if I did.