Gaijin couldnt balance a plate on a flat surface if their life depended on it.
3 Likes
This win rate contains the USSR vs USSR mirror match results, so I think USSR vs Other nations will be higher than this.
According to statShark website in the BR spread of 9.7-12.7 the BMPT is the only vehicle currently sporting an almost 2.0 Kills per spawn and the only one rocking above a 2.0 Kills per death. The only other things close are either random outliers due to low battle counts in the last x amount of time or the BMPT or t-64B (huh again russian tank that got buffed)
Need i say more.
4 Likes
Gonna visit ru 10.7 for a little bit to pad the winning rate bro since I have a lot of vehicles in their 40-ish lol wish me luck bro
devs DON’T care btw less meat or they send u a ban for that
The worst vehicle ever.
Just about a complete sideshot at about 1300m, what are you even supposed to do?
8 Likes
For short, L26 should have about 450mm of pen at this range and angle
3 Likes
This tank is so far disconnected from any form of game balance and/or realism it’s almost comical. Arguably the most hand held tank to date. Little to no weakspots aside from the lower plate and some volumetric hell. Equipped with ERA that has been not realistic, modeled wrong and broken for years. With two autocannons that shred barrels and tracks more reliably than main battle tank guns and if they pen, the evaporate the crew. 4 Missiles that do not overpressure the tank when struck and an ammo belt that does not ammo rack the vehicle when struck.
I won’t call it bias but the selective realism is strong with this one. Especially looking at it’s service history and the performance of that thing in real life.
Even sadder is the battle rating that tank was introduced with. This just goes to show how incompetent the balancing department (if it exists) really is. Pure greed.
8 Likes
None of Bmp 2 can fire APFSDS. The one in game the 2M uses the Belgian designed round. In reality Russia have not ever had a Dart for the BMP-2/3 or BMD-4 any of the 2A42 cannons there are questionable sources on the 3UBR11 ever being used.
And no evidence from the recent conflict
2 Likes
same bro with the leo2a4 is hard to get but is real i get 2 nukes in one day with them (one is with a up tier to the second is with 10.0-11.0)
3UBR11 exists/existed as a offered ammunition-type for them, however this ammo-type isnt used in active service currently.
Even 3UBR8 (APDS) is seen very rarely in service, with 3UBR6 (AP-T) being the much, much more commonly used armour piercing ammunition type.
But even then BMPT and BMPT72 arent specified for using APFSDS in the brochures from Uralvagonzavod and as such there is no reliable evidence that their feeding system allows the use of 3UBR11.
1 Like
Has the violent barrel shaking that happens when it fires IRL been fixed IRL or could we add historical inaccuracy on the autocannons and maybe leave it at 10.7 or move it to 11.0? The biggest issue people have with this aside from its armour is how quickly it can shred a barrel and tracks, making the gun more realistically inaccurate would maybe help fix that issue imo, if it isnt added i dont see it being fair bellow 11.3 in its current state.
T-80BVM was never OP, and citing win-rate is saying it wasn’t OP.
DM53 can currently pen K5 + T-72B array.
People need to stop citing an average MBT as OP just cause good players played it.
Cause that argumentation can be correctly used to incorrectly call the Leclerc OP when it isn’t.
Aim lower so you don’t hit roof armor.
BMPT is OP and should be moved up; however hitting those bouncing shots are done on every tank with steel plates over tracks.
@Cyvell_シ
That inaccuracy is when both cannons fire causing opposing gas forces.
1 Like
The instance shown was caused by relict destabilization due to the additional ERA panels and the subsequently struck module(s).
Also keep in mind that the responeImpulse destab effect is only applied to the side-era that’s spaced from the hull (and the upper side-part on BMPT for whatever reason).
The tiles that are directly placed onto the hull (e.g. upperfront or turret-front) do not have this destabilization effect.
It cannot fire both guns simultainously, there is a two-way switch on the gunner’s controls, which allows him to select either ammo-type (as each gun has one belt and thus belt selection = gun selection).
The videos that you can find of BMPT firing with horrendeous dispersion at high RoF (550 rpm) usually also show the guns at some point, where you can see that only one is firing via the respective ports the casings are ejected through.
The shitty design of the vehicle just makes the other barrel wobble so extremely that it looks like both are recoiling at once, despite it only being one.
T-80BVM was never OP, and citing win-rate is saying it wasn’t OP.
People need to stop citing an average MBT as OP just cause good players played it.
Cause that argumentation can be correctly used to incorrectly call the Leclerc OP when it isn’t.
Difference is, Russia is a major nation. Not a minor nation like France. IIRC the T-80BVM held a 60%+ winrate for months.
DM53 can currently pen K5 + T-72B array.
They must’ve changed this at one point. I recall on release DM53 was penning K-5, then they changed it so that it couldn’t for a while.
Hmm I won’t try to deny anything but sometimes, more than not, winrates in Russia are carried by CAS.
The win rate is an indicator that we have a complete lack of balance between nations.
1 Like