Bismarck's armour scheme might not be as OP as expected

Actually, angling doesn’t work as just cos(degree). Only 45 degree of armor gives twice the practical penetration needed due to APCBC’s weakness against sloped armor. So it would be not completely ‘immune’ to AP like Scharnhorst do without angling, but definitely not 600~630 ish. I expect about 700mm.

Also, Bismarck is something that cannot angle, actually much better at angling for survival than all those three ships mentioned. Turtleback would be not super level of OP, but still would be OP.
Barbette fire would be bigger problem for Bismarck, as it’s typical layout of every german battleship design.

How do you think the draft change will affect scharnhorst if it comes? (Report was put in basically it’s accurate in the hangar but suddenly decides to drop like 2m in naval battles).

What does that even mean?

1 Like

There probably nerf for Scharn could arrive.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1oUfrcJ9n5st

1 Like

It’s hard to tell for now. It’s certainly going to reduce its invincibility but by how much, I don’t know. Fix to Scharnhorst’s draft will likely be deployed upon the next major so we will see.

3 Likes

To have 630+mm pen

1 Like

Interesting.

I have one question:)

Have you calculated the penetration capability of Richelieu?

lol.

Dear lord Royal Navy why did you refuse to make super heavy shells (relative to the competition) post WW1

source used is this one :
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNFR_15-45_m1935.php

For APC Modèle 1936 on a 10km shot, it gives this :
image

TLDR, it seems to fall short; although not by much, and the fall angle might be enough to pen anyway

Also, did Vanguard while we are at it, with a 9.1km shot and the 879kg shell using supercharge :

image

same source : 15-inch (38.1 cm) Mark I - NavWeaps

I don’t know how the supercharge works, but falling from 630mm @5km to 530mm @10 km seems rough, it’s possible i missed something here

And bismarck herself, 10km :

image

Then again it seems low, and the shell seems excessively light, maybe i missed something ?

still the same good old navweaps :
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNGER_15-52_skc34.php

All in all, the Japs and the US will have the best shells : highest pen and nice explosive mass, while the rest has to sacrifice something due to the use of a lower caliber :

The italians sacrified the explosive mass, but get a very nice pen, and can be up there with the big calibers in that regard
The germans and the brits seems to have sacrified the pen, but kept a very good explosive mass
The french shell fares not too bad, having still a good explosive mass while being halfway “in the middle” in terms of pen (which i can’t really explain tbh, just the shell weight maybe ?)

3 Likes

now adays scran isnt even op anymore its guns do little damage and dont pen to much armor and all it has is good survivability

survivability is all it has

Thank you :)

1 Like

Also do note that navweap’s range table of 15’’ supercharge is of ‘average’ gun, not ‘new’ gun, which is about 34 m/s faster

1 Like

Is there any discussion on swapping the demarre formula with another for naval weapons?

1 Like

image
image

1 Like

image
14" for those interested

1 Like

Reading this made my day better, let’s hope Gaijin gets it right

1 Like

It’s wrong unrealistic formula.
more realistic (even compare between gun)
http://www.navweaps.com/index_nathan/Penetration_Germany.php

I mean you can take the problem with whatever formula you want, the shell is quite lighter compared to other 380mm ones, and the muzzle velocity isn’t stellar as well, with the HE filler being quite large, so it will have less pen

That and the unusual turret disposition makes the 8.3 BR they gave it not so surprising i guess

Gaijin doesn’t seem to understand that any armor can be penetrated with enough speed — whether it’s a ballistic vest or ship armor. I thought that was common knowledge. For example, in the USN empirical formula, velocity is raised to the power of 1.1, while mass is only raised to 0.55.
Compare Okun’s calculations to what Gaijin uses — just look at the penetration ratios of the shells they’ve modeled. It’s clear as day.

Figures at 0 meters and 14,600 meters (almost 15,000), all versus British Cemented Armor, for example — and effective pen (shell not broken):

  • Yamato: 31.7 and 19.3
  • Iowa: 32.8 and 21
  • Bismarck: 31.1 and 18.5
  • Richelieu: 32.9 and 18.8
  • Roma: 31.9 and 20.4

Gaijin’s values (first one for 1000 m):

  • Yamato: 870 and 630
  • Iowa: 857 and 583
  • Bismarck: 708 and 439
  • Richelieu: 738 and 491
  • Roma: 771 and 513

You get it, right?

In the end, it’s clear the Germans are nerfed — as usual — in this ‘game’.
Iowa and Yamato obviously have overestimated penetration values. Or, more likely, the 380 mm guns are heavily underrated.
Iowa’s penetration matches what’s in Battleships: United States Battleships 1935–1992, calculated using the USN empirical formula. But using the same formula, Bismarck’s penetration is actually significantly higher.
Double standards, perhaps?

That formula gives more weight to velocity than to shell mass.
Yet in Gaijin’s model, Richelieu — with the same caliber, 10% more shell mass, and 2.5% less velocity — has higher penetration.

According to Okun, close-range penetrations are nearly identical across these calibers, but heavier shells lose velocity more slowly — which makes sense.
So either the penetration values for the 406–460 mm guns are inflated (except for Rodney’s 406 mm for some reason — although SS also show inflated values in the same pattern), or the 380 mm guns are massively underrated — most notably Bismarck’s.

And all these ships will be matched against each other anyway — as we all know, BR 8.7 vs. 8.3 makes no real difference

Now let’s talk about the Sovetsky Soyuz.
Its shell, with the same caliber and penetration on par with Iowa’s, somehow has twice the explosive filler. And it’s also significantly faster. How is that even possible??
image

And its semi-AP shell is somehow more powerful than comparable HE shells — while still having penetration close to that of 380 mm AP shells. What kind of magic is this?
image

2 Likes