The D-2 and D-3 would never enter production because introduction of the Established Emil. I even asked TEC, and he would live to see it in game, and it would complete the production BF 109’s. It was THE BF 109 that got thing going in the right direction
I’ll repeat my question: for what you wanna add this plane? A prototype, I do understand. But why?
see edited comment
Is that the point? Then successors is cursed?
complete the production BF 109’s and I am BF 109 Enthusiast and the enjoyment at low BR BF’s
To complete the model row of 109’s presented in game? It makes sense. And this is the only one to add? I enjoy low BR vehicles too.
+1 It would be nice to add the remaining models not added yet. Same is true hopefully for the Spitfires.
Indeed it would.
+1
Reminds me of the Fw 190 C, an intermediary variant of a very well known German fighter
Very unique vehicle
I just found out that the 109 D had a DB600.
I always thought it was a Jumo.
+1 please
It drastically increased performance form the Jumo
Most source say it had the DB600Aa.
An engine mounted MG FF would be somewhat unique.
Still waiting for them to fix the unhistorical ammunition selection, the MG FF uses, though.
It should only have Practice, Practice-tracer and HEF-T(SD) shells.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/cVQRAK08JYTS
The the practice round wouldn’t be used in combat, so it would only be firing Practice-Tracer for armor penetration and the HEF-T.
Very cool to learn about and read on your post
If such a change, pure traceless Practice would be nice.
But that wasn’t really used for combat. Technically only the HEF-T and “Tracer” was used, while the tracerless round was just for gun adjustments.
But I guess, Gaijin might add it as a stealth belt, who knows.
Not sure how effective that would be.
Same as a P-T round against ground, but without tracer. (Which i prefer, cince its better to hit ground and airtragets with, as they usually wont move, nor know from where i attack then.