me when i lie
Its up to me that we have now 4 instead of 12 warbond shops per year? tf? In what world was that my decicion to make the warbond shop only worth 1/3 per year?
And in what world do we argue with you prefer tanks you personally dont have vs having better stuff in the warbond shop in general?? Whats that of an argument? Find for you, personally, but that dosnt change the shop decreases in value?!
You move goalposts: Above you talked about “it”, which in the sentence before was a premium:
Now you clarified you mean shops by “it”. I meant that you can take out more than 1 premiums per shop. I also said that “You can buy more than one vehicle in the store”. So if you have the WB, you can take out as many as you like.
Who is “we”? You and me? Or are you a royal highness? Or did the punctuation go awol?
“Value” is in the eye of the beholder. The vehicle shop holds nothing of “value” for all those who already own the content or never play it. Which means the pass becomes less valuable (for the same price) to these people. So don’t expect everyone else to value the shop the way you do.
1 Like
It? what it? tf ure talking about? Warbond shop was used to be a monthly reward (12) and is now a seasonal reward (4 per year)… so what do u want from me? And why the hell do u assume i meant it was premium? That makes no sense.
Value is not in the eye of the beholder, value is defined and isnt changed… just because u want to buy that car for 10k dosnt mean the value is 10k. The value of the SWarbond shop has a 1:1 Gold/Dollar value, if it goes down then it goes down, no matter your opinion.
I know, I plundered them regularly since the summer of 2016.
Because in one sentence you talked about the premiums, and in the very next sentence you talk about “it” and “rewards” and nowhere about store in the entire post. But haven’t we already figured out that you meant store?
Nice try, but lets take something more official: " Value is the balance between what a customer sees as the benefit to them of a product and the price they have to pay for it." (Collins Dictionary)
This is obviously a subjective thing.
If you don’t agree, then Gaijin could make you happy with this:
Increase the GE price of all rank I Premiums to 5000 GE and put them in the WB store instead of the cheaper rank 2 and rank 3. There you go, now it holds something of value because “It says so!”.
1 Like
ive been learning french, its got to catastrophic levels, someone said gratuitous in Enlgish, i googled it, and though oh they mean gratuite, they sound the same.
Then it hit me like an existential crisis, i knew the French word for something and didnt know the English one. Im turning, turning, into a frog!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
2 Likes
Its joever for you buddy. There’s nothing we can do to help you at this point. You’re too far gone.
a spitfire is a spitfire no matter.
just as a mosquito is a mosquito even if it looks like it got stung on the nose by a northern giant hornet
its a half-arsed copy paste rather than full on lazy
i like it but its still not new
2 Likes
Nothing about it is a lie. A simple comparison with any of the current versions shows very clearly the vehicles are different variants entirely.
J30:
NF II:
1 Like
We do not even have the variant it is based on (MK XIX). The J30 is a further variant of this, with several more changes unique to Sweden.
Its very strange to start labelling variants of a vehicle as “copy paste” in any form. Factually very much incorrect.
Nobody would claim the Spitfire IX is a “copy paste” of the Mk I. Equally the J30 is not a “copy paste” of any existing Mosquito.
its another variant.
of a plane thats already quite well represented in that tree. Overrepresented compared to its native tree maybe.
Its still cool but not a fan of it being flaunted as fully new.
Nobody claimed that:
1 Like
Dude… no matter what u try to argue, a Warbondshop that has the Gold Value of 10.000 Gold has more Value then a Warbond shot that has the Value of 9.000 Gold, and there is absolut nothing u can say against it and your esotericaly nonesense has only value to yourself.
And if ure so bad with assumtion of what other have saied without saying it, then maybe ask next time before assuming smt wtf. The whole conversation is dead already by you not reading and processing that properly, instead u went with hairthin assumtions to make your non objective point stand out.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Hp0zcAoMBWLG
Bug report for the missing AI for the AN/APS-4
1 Like
Forwarded thanks.
2 Likes
Any loadout?
No, sweden never put any A2G weapons on it.
You’re a heavier Mossie with the upgraded engines not being present because gaijin just felt like it didn’t need them
2 Likes
No A2G, but that didn’t stop them adding wing bombs to the B.XVI which also never used them*, only fuel tanks on the universal carriers (and still not bombs added to the FB.VI which certainly did! ). There are pics of the wing pylons, but that’s only because the fairings and tanks are removed leaving only the mounting.
The J30 has more in common with the FB. VI than the NF. II. It used the same fuselage, wing and engines (single stage Merlin 25) carried over from the FB. VI via the NF. XIII but with a universal nose allowing both US and British radars and minus the MGs and bomb carriers in the rear bay.
- the 6 bomb load on the B.XVI was carried internally on an Avro Six Bomb carrier, not 4 internally + 2 externally as Gajin have it… It could also have 2x1000lb TI/MC/HC internally which aren’t offered as an option.
… On a side note, 1000lb wing bombs were tested on a FB. VI but rejected after when an empty bomb casing was accidently flown and the assymetric weight made the plane nearly uncontrollable.
4 hispano only i believe.
1 Like