Its only the radar on the aircraft thats placeholder. Which is common for most unreleased and new vehicles. This will be fixed as I said.
Its a new variant of the aircraft. You could make this same claim about any new variants of an existing airframe.
It already is a unique version visually and will further be as its radar is finalised.
If there is evidence it should have it, it can be reported for sure yes.
And as I said, the plane is now available for public testing at which stage it’s unique features should be at least in a preliminary state for testing. Right now the only bug report is the inability to make a bug report.
You yourself claimed it was a unique plane, only now you say a new variant. That’s much closer to the originally as people have pointed out repeatedly.
4 blades and a blunt nose, yes that’s technically different. But if those changes aren’t represented in the actual aircrafts performance or ability then it’s little more than a new skin.
As I said there should be no need for Placeholders when a vehicle is already in open public testing. Either start development earlier to avoid the situation, or CBT the model until closer to release because all it does is make early impressive very negative. Starting the BP and attempting to sell unrepresentative vehicles surely can’t be a good business model or great for customer relations.
PS-20 was the Swedish designation for the SCR-720B which had IFF integrated.
https://ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/ref/NightFighterRadars/index.html
And the radar in action (in its British Mk. X form)
Yup, trying to locate some more sources. i dont know if that website would be enough for a report.
Unfortunately most sites and references don’t differentiate between the SCR-720 subvariants which doesn’t help.
I can’t see the IFF function being removed during the refurbishment prior to delivery, however proving it may be impossible, especially if you don’t speak Swedish.
The AEF specifies the IFF (IK) equipment used as PN-53A, which is the SCR-729F. J30 Nattjaktplan Jaktflygplan
The 729 F is an interrogator, based on the 729 A. https://swanwich.uk/iff-and-radar-beacons/
Yes, therefore it would be preferable with more sources for it.
Imperial War Museum has a film on the AI Mk.X. They are usually considered a trustworthy organisation. Pity you can’t watch direct.
https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/1060039174
Note the description for Reel 2 includes ‘IFF interrogation’.
Thats not the case at all.
It has been said multiple times now that the radar is preliminary whilst its configured.
Its not a new skin, but a new variant.
As mentioned earlier, only the radar is currently placeholder. Anything else suspected of being incorrect should be properly reported.
All but the vehicles are consumed in a matter of time.
The battle pass has gone down hill since the very first one.
We got a heavy tank rank V, and a Corsair Rank IV I believe, and a naval vessel Rank IV.
I’m not saying they all have to be rank V or anything, but more variety would be nice…
It’s the same price Battle pass for less value, and it’s becoming less and less value.
Talismans are all still there.
My foilage branches too.
I was talking about in the battle pass…? You don’t get foliage or talismans from the BP.
Oh I hear ya, it has changed since it began, no doubt. But it’s still not a “bad” deal,
provided you have the time to work it, as I mentioned.
But yeah, less stuff overall . . . which is kind of to be expected . . . not like they can offer
4 new/unique vehicles every BP forever or anything . . . that’s unrealistic.
Similar to how much top tier stuff they have added in a short time, might be running
out of stuff before too long . . . which might be problematic.
But for example: a tank main looks at a BP that has no tank offered in that particular one
and gets angry, bashes Gaijin and the BP as a whole. All because there is nothing that
is geared/focused directly at them. We get a lot that look only at the 2 vehicles we now
get and that seems to be a shame to me . … . really all I was pointing out.
Battlepass is open to all players with rank 3 and above.! a huge proportion of players dont even have above rank 5!
Might only be 4 players in each rank, but I bet by all mighty some players wouldnt get 1 kill at rank 6 after a majority of matches.!!
Personally - this is just another part of the event that is grinding players down! Unfair and ridiculous!
Might as well just make the Battle Pass only available in 2 ways!
Rank 7 and above and or Buy!
Warbond Shop, which is tied directly to the BP and has a whole bunch of other things a
player can get too . . . just more stuff that gets overlooked by many who lament the BP.
Yeah, so Challenges can seem a bit “forced” and out of reach for ALL players.
But the cool thing about the Challenges is, you can do the BP and advance just fine,
without having to do ALL the Challenges.
I have worked every BP so far, my lowest level finishing has been 134.
Of the 21 I have already done, I only did ALL the Challenges 4 or 5 times.
Do the parts you can, without straining or stressing yourself . . . it’s still a game
again, the problem is - if one wants to complete it, they simply cant unless they progress.
New players/low mid - barely rank 3 stand very little to no chance to even obtain it. ( for the mid to seasoned players ).
The other kool feature - if you complete all tasks , you get some thing shiney as some people like to complete and attain too… again only aimed at all those people who have unlocked and obtained for endless periods.!
So its not really kool to be fair for others, ( Im fine in this area so its not about me!)
