https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Hp0zcAoMBWLG
Bug report for the missing AI for the AN/APS-4
1 Like
Forwarded thanks.
2 Likes
Any loadout?
No, sweden never put any A2G weapons on it.
You’re a heavier Mossie with the upgraded engines not being present because gaijin just felt like it didn’t need them
2 Likes
No A2G, but that didn’t stop them adding wing bombs to the B.XVI which also never used them*, only fuel tanks on the universal carriers (and still not bombs added to the FB.VI which certainly did! ). There are pics of the wing pylons, but that’s only because the fairings and tanks are removed leaving only the mounting.
The J30 has more in common with the FB. VI than the NF. II. It used the same fuselage, wing and engines (single stage Merlin 25) carried over from the FB. VI via the NF. XIII but with a universal nose allowing both US and British radars and minus the MGs and bomb carriers in the rear bay.
- the 6 bomb load on the B.XVI was carried internally on an Avro Six Bomb carrier, not 4 internally + 2 externally as Gajin have it… It could also have 2x1000lb TI/MC/HC internally which aren’t offered as an option.
… On a side note, 1000lb wing bombs were tested on a FB. VI but rejected after when an empty bomb casing was accidently flown and the assymetric weight made the plane nearly uncontrollable.
4 hispano only i believe.
1 Like
Eh its in a weird spot gaijin is so strange with the nordic tree because a lot of vehicles are only allowed historical loadouts (all Finnish air) but then some additions are given balance over realism so its really up in the air for this vehicle.
The Mosquito is treated oddly considering it’s so well documented, and the Nordic planes only add to the problem. Still bemused by the fudged F.II, realism left the game years ago.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the J30 gets bombs and rockets simply because as a guns only it’s a hard sell. Maybe Sim Air players will get some use out the radar because I doubt many others will. The 4 blade props won’t give a major boost considering they are still the same engines.
I think they would have been better served adding the J30 as a Swedish Squadron, and give the Israelis a premium as their tree is even thinner.
This BP will be a minimal effort from me.
this is just the first prototype of the tank in real life
by your logic it’s like having the pz 3 in the game and saying it’s the same game like company of heroes
Well, that’s extremely disappointing, the new ELC and the ELC Bis will never get to have 360° turret traverse in any capacity.
1 Like
I wanted to check the loading screen reward and I noticed this issue:
(It’s the Re.2005 VDM from the previous season)
Sweet, most tasks are doable in ASB. Premium mossie woo.
Battlepass tank is kinda meh. Sherman III/IV is ridiculously OP on the other hand. It’s waaay better than US M4 at 3.7 - no weakspots, waaay more powerfull engine, same BR.
Pure pay2win, basically similar level to SAV, but here you trade insane ROF and 1-shot kills for a TON of frontal armor that could make KV-1E blush.
2 Likes
killing naval bots seem not to count for the first bp-challenge??? Intented or bug?
1 Like
Does the first challenge not say player vehicles?
2 Likes
uhm?
This is the current battle pass, not the previous one
1 Like
Selective realism
Since there is atleast XIX marks (variants) lets add them all and call them uniques.
GAIJIN is really lazy. Players want the previous vehicle, so they replace the new vehicle in the pass with the old one, which reduces the workload. GAIJIN has increased a lot of players in the past few years, but has it still not increased its staff? Still exploiting the staff?
2 Likes
This battle pass is a skip, all low br vehicles, nothing really notably worth it.
Please tell me this is a joke. The tech tree tank is just vastly better, the lowest reward I already have all the ships but one, which isn’t that good.
The plane is also a disappointment.
3 Likes