I may not play boats but I definitely feel like removing boats would be unfair to those who enjoy them. Plus really don’t need them removing more stuff from these things. Just do away with the box and let people select what they want.
2 Likes
While I appreciate your enthusiasm, it’s possible you may not have your finger on the pulse of the player base, or know what they may or may not want.
There are MANY players and we all like different things, so . . . .
7 Likes
Not like it’s a first time for snail to conduct surveys
They did it multiple times with preset answers and with just empty text boxes, where everyone could whrite their opinion
3 Likes
Y’all are gonna feel bad when naval hits 2% of games played this month…
2 Likes
Naval as a whole is just playing the long con
1 Like
let me repeat it; “list a couple of vehicles you would add and let us chose from it” if they add 4 options to chose from, there is next to zero chance to all be 25%-25%…
2 Likes
Like Minecraft devs on mobs? I dont think i want that system ngl
1 Like
The first prototype of the WZ-141 was equipped with the HJ-73 ATGMs, so was the second prototype as well - why is the new WZ-141 coming with the Flying Dragon battle pass not going to be equipped with said ATGMs in-game?
Second Prototyope
1 Like
British grant in American tree over a decade since Britain got made into its own tree
MOVE THIS PREMIUM OVER BRO
M8, there is a bri’ish Grant
And it’s the same one
its not the same one. theres also one huge issue with that one
2 Likes
Same cannons
Same shells
Both even use the same model(well, the US one has the rug around 75mm, but that changes nothing)
It’s the exact same Grant 1 as the US has
For you - yes. For snail? Nah.
There’s a ton of vehicles that you can’t even obtain on the marketplace, that’s the problem
1 Like
Initially, the first prototype lacked the ATGM rails, and had the 12.7mm HMG.
I can only assume it was a conscious decision to then distinguish it from a future TT version (with ATGMs, probably second prototype) but that might just be copium on my behalf.
- Version being added
2 Likes
It’s a joke man . . . but the point is that hardly anything at all that Gaijin has let the players “choose” has turned out very well.
Picture this, 3 decent vehicles and 4th that is a complete turd and has no business even being considered for the game.
You cannot imagine enough trolls, goobers and the Maturity Challenged voting for the turd to make it win just to be . . . “that way”?
Being a Merry Prankster from days gone by, that’s the first thing I can think of and believe me, I’ll wager there are a TON more players that literally live for chances like that . . . . lol.
It’s Gaijin’s game, they make the decisions and choose the vehicles, themes and make the events. We get to play what they offer us, or choose not to, pretty simple.
Like I said, I appreciate your desire, but I am pragmatic about most things and your idea just doesn’t seem like one that would ever come to fruition . . nothing personal and no attack intended.
As far as I am concerned, we’re all friends here . . . even tho we spend most of our time trying to “end” each other . … lol
It’s a video game
2 Likes
Its tragic that people are excited for vehicles like these.
3 Likes
I would agree with you if things like the T-80BV didn’t exist in-game with thermals which is never historically had for the most part, unless they want this vehicle sitting at a specific BR it should get the HJ-73 in the form of a modification.
I’m just glad there’s finally a bp which can be ignored. Just like 3 months without tasks and grind. Last BPs all contained potential high value market place vehicles, which I couldn’t ignore.
This is the sole reason I’ve quit buying battle passes. I’m not paying for a 1 out of 4 chance of getting what I want; and of a digital item, no less. It’s actually insulting.
1 Like
LET’S GO the decals are fire
We need more Chinese decals like this during monthly decals
2 Likes