The Canberra isn’t enough I think the tech tree needs more bombers
3 Likes
EC RB could make the addition of new unique planes much more feasible, not to mention that it would be very easy to implement (just ctrl c ctrl v sim)
1 Like
It’s actually not, guess you have a skill issue
1 Like
If Gaijin (as well as the community) can eventually come to an agreement on a good solution to make bombers such as this justifiable, I don’t see why it couldn’t be added.
Hell, Gaijin could add it right now and I guarantee a number of people would get it, so +1
4 Likes
we need big planes… +1
3 Likes
I think I’d rather have the definitive and last production B-52H variant over this B-52D. The B-52H has better turbofan engines with more thrust (17,000 lbf each = fastest and highest climb rate), a 20-mm rotary cannon with 1,424 rounds in the tail turret, and chaff and flare dispensers. All these things in the B-52H would make its most survivable B-52 member of the B-52 family if the B-52 is to be added into War Thunder, IMHO.
I’d accept any b52 tbh lol
1 Like
I would love to see this
1 Like
we need some major changes in the game for these bombers
1 Like
I agree but we needed (and still need) some major changes for a lot of content to come properly/balanced to the game, look at the mess that current top tier air battles are, for example.
At this point i don’t care anymore tbh, they could add the b-52 tomorrow and i would be fine with it.
1 Like
+1 from me. The B-52 is the last strategic bomber that could conceivably be added to the US TT. It has a stealth coating, flares, and the early variants do have turrets. I think it does have enough going for it to make it a worthy inclusion, though, as stated, it’s probably the last of America’s strat bombers that could reasonably be added in the game’s current state.
1 Like
+1 for the B-52 support, found some music about the Buff and I thought I would share
enjoy
1 Like
See gaijin, we already have the song for the trailer ;)
1 Like