probably, dont have dev open currently tho
Does AGM-88E have C-K band also?
88E not ingame but if it was added it could get that as well if they implement 88G one
1 Like
which is interesting since it is written on the missile itself in WT
3 Likes
definitely worth pinging a tech mod for this if you know one
its not gonna change anything anyway, the statements are way too vague.
And the 88G is getting buffed in .16 anyway as of rn
still hilarious when the answer is that a source about the AARGM-ER dosent say anything about the 88G
and even more so when you look at it ingame
2 Likes
So when is my CM-102 gonna gets its mach 3.5 cruise and not be a glorified 88A
- LD-10 needs another 10secs more guidance time
are they though?
speed has a very clear definition
and increased speed is clearly stated
even if they make its top speed 1 m/s faster than the in game AGM-88A it will be a substantial buff over its current performance
2 Likes
If you combine it with the clear reduced drag claims and the “double speed” claim it can compete with the Kh-31 probably, which it should be able to as a next gen ARM
If they won’t give AGM-88G high supersonic glide then I doubt for CM-102 since it’s also rocket
1 Like
My english vocabulary is simply too limited to accurately describe the emotion i currently feel towards BRM1.
*it is to limited to describe it in a way that wont get you forum banned
If they add the AGM-158 I guess I’m flat out of luck for any bug report source where it’s called JASSM
Got a question about ARMs: I tried locking a plane using Shrikes, but it didn’t work. Is that a bug or were you not able to do so IRL?
I don’t know much about BVR stuff so I assumed it’d just work.
it is intentional but not realistic
all ARMs are specifically coded to not be able to detect aircraft radars in game
1 Like
I was looking forward to the GR4 being a BVR Monster with 9x ALARM :P
Would have been nice addition to air to air frogfoot too.