Answering your concerns regarding spall liners, MBTs and Aircraft

It does not make everything boeing has made recently garbage I see your point but It was one part of Boeing

Russian airliners actually have a much worse aviation safety record. The main difference is that the west has a free press that dares to amplify information that may be harmful to corporations.

THIS IS SO TRUE. Like if you really think about it if people are trying to find something wrong with a company they will and will write something about it. Like with Boeing, but (I’m not saying this isn’t bad) when was the last time Boeing had something like this happen. SO ONE MISTAKE DOSENT MAKE THE COMPANY BAD. (This is not directed towards the person i’m quoting but ever how is saying that Boeing is garbage or making garbage things)

I stated the operators of russian aircraft have inferior safety standards in general. About free press, this is a half truth and only with the advent of internet it became more of a thing. Lobbying was pretty notorious.

Eric Hartman’s post war story is rather interesting

Boeing of today likely has nothing to do with the same company from 30 years ago, other than the name. Much like most other similar companies, profits matter more than some other things. Lobbying is ruining everything

Because it is necessary for a competent defense industry. Furthermore, diversification is necessary for all first world nations to remain economically powerful. The fact that you are making this excuse for Russia is lumping them in with the third world. Which, also amplifies my point. It’s not just that the don’t make good stuff, but that they can’t afford to make good stuff because they don’t have the money or educational base to make it happen. Russia is a one trick pony. Selling natural resources. In everything else they are ignorant, incompetent, or both. That’s the point.

Well I suppose you could say the excel at beating their population into obedience. As well as a first rate propaganda game. But shrug neither of those things help with building good weapons.

2 Likes

You’re ignoring that they are sanctioned to hell by the so called first world, and when it comes to arms deals lobbying exists. If you’re an American you are basically a pot kettle scenario. Unironically if the amount of sanctions russia has applied to the usa they would implode. I think russia is doing ok despite all, for what they are.

All companies that trade on the NYSE must maximize profit. They are required to, by law. Not arguing they aren’t messing up, but it’s more complex than “corporations bad” or “they buy off the government”. While this may or may not happen it’s much more complex issue than this. It also ignores all the corporations that just make quality products.

At this point is more about politics and agendas than just profits

This was the case long before the recent round of sanctions. And having used USA military equipment in combat. It is definitely the best in the world, at least along the length and breadth of the services. Russian stuff vs. USA stuff is like comparing a Yugo to a Maybach.

1 Like

Nope.
Rule number 1. It’s all about the money.
Rule number 2. When in doubt refer to rule number 1.

Even politics needs money to work. I know I’m not going to convince you, but you might want to get off the tinfoil hate channels and start actually trying to learn how corporations and acquisitions processes actually work. I did it for four years. And it’s not a simple thing.

1 Like

De jure no, de facto not at all. Even before 2014.

Personal bias, respectable but you have probably not used anything else to get a better view

Yugo is less likely to break and it’s affordable

How many russian vehicles have them? 10? You said vehicleS so can you name them. Because from my knowledge only the t90m has.

The only thing russian vehicles have and is overperforming is the relikt bullshit. Leopard dominate and thats a NATO vehicle. Usa players keep coping about this, despite the majority of their problems being skill related.

And vikhrs having dual purpose warheads without need to switch + unrealistically accurate FM.

And Pantsir outranging any NATO spaa and having guns for close defense (only US ADATS has secondary gun among all NATO top tier spaa).

MiG27K on release was also a major stinker.

Or do you remember how BMP2M was 8.7 for majority of its life? While were at it, how many NATO IFVs can launch SACLOS missiles while going full speed, just like BMP2M?

Or 2S38 general existence?

There are many unrealistically performing aspects to russian top tier. Not just relikt bags.

4 Likes

And it took a communal uproar for the Leo(1 NATO) and Sweden(Not NATO) to also get them because Gaijin was originally only going to implement it for T-90 - Russia. So out of all the nations in the game, only 3 vehicles have spall liners. However, only 1 NATO vehicle in-game has it. No other NATO countries do despite reality proving otherwise.

And only the Relickt is overperforming, you say?
Lol. Lmfao.

You are comically, objectively wrong on that.

1 Like

If you’re going to parrot this like many others do here atleast provide reliable sources.

Added too early. Despite that it’s radar is bugged to hell, you can abuse this with the f16c or other similar in performance cas.

2 undertiered premiums, what a shocker.

Is this any different from the f16c. Probably the only time russia had good cas, harrier was still probably better.

Only 1 nato vehicle has them? Are you unaware or ignorant? Leos have them, few challengers have them. cv90s(?). You have almost a baseless argument. Yes devs are russian so one might naturally think they are favouring russia, but money seems to have a bigger gravitational force to them. Otherwise russian airplanes would be more often undertiered and artificially buffed like many usaf planes are.

Naturally it seems you cannot read.

No other NATO countries in-game have them implemented in-game. Gaijin said they are " working on it ", which is about as confidence-inducing a statement as a politician promising to end taxation.

The rest of your drivel is objectively bullshit and not worth responding to.

Keep coping, you have 0 arguments. You state only 1 Nato country has them while its 3 or more at this point. Also the amount of shit I’ve seen americans post in this forum in order for the abrams to get spall liners is funny to say the least.

1 Like

The only one coping here is you, but go off I guess.

Keep dancing for us, Jester.