Air needs to go up to br 13
2 Likes
The overlords demanding a written and signed note of the engineers themselves to consider the bug report
2 Likes
Leopard 2a7v is not as good as Sweden 122? Oh, my God, I hope you can take your brains and not be so shameless. Why don’t you just say weaken you and take the armor of the last century and fill the armor of this dynasty? Why don’t you put 72AV armor on 90m?
8 Likes
Nah thats just the soviet bug reports, and they dont even need to provide evidence it was actually the engineer. For the other nations, especially Britain, you need bug reports with more detail than the average PHD thesis for it to even be consider.
At this point I’m like half sure they don’t want to estimate because then they’d have to do the math to see how good the armor should be lmao
1 Like
it isnt particularly hard to believe because typically you build your armor to defeat your own weapons and their projected growth and US APFSDS from 2007 would have probably been able to pen 650mm+ from close range
Shameless gaijin will ignore😅
It’s really strange, why don’t Russian tanks have any armor problems but NATO tanks have a lot of armor problems?😅
12 Likes
Why do you always standing on the opposite side of the player?
2 Likes
The hull armor of the A7V is at least D armor pack + composite armor, and the Ke is at least 600+100mm
4 Likes
I highly doubt why they are not willing to allow the Abrams to be reinforced with armor. Isn’t this nothing more than a willingness to arbitrarily weaken American vehicles? Are you afraid that the status of Russian vehicles will be threatened?
What’s the point of a bug report if you don’t accept the evidence submitted?
4 Likes
Strengthen Chinese vehicles, otherwise I won’t recharge a penny
I also hope to shift the focus from updating to rebalancing. But this seems quite difficult, after all, balance cannot earn money:（
Okay, there’s no content about Chinese tanks.
What is the significance of Merkava 4’s existence, as he not only did not receive the spam liners, but also the loading time remained the slowest?
1 Like
The official announcement on the website told you everything about the product. A scam is when you don’t get what was advertised.
If I sell you a normal apple for 50€ while telling you it’s just a normal apple, it’s not a scam.
Noone deceived you, noone was dishonest.
to say they have no power is wrong, they still have a line of communication with those devs, so how they portray information to them DOES in fact give them “power”
Thats why that chinese historian got booted because he was actively giving devs wrong information, while the historian is different to a CM or Mod, CMs especially should or I would expect them to have some direct communication with someone or devs themselves. thus back to my first point above.
If M829A3 wont enhance Abrams capability comparing to 829A2, why not just add 829A3 then? Anyway they have barely no difference.
If Gripen is the only one that is not at the same level as the previous 12.3 aircrafts, why not just move Gripen to 12.7 ? You can also buff Su27/J11 and move them to 12.7 at the same time, rather than nerfing Gripen.
What about Chinese MBTs ? ZTZ99A & WZ1001E & VT4A1 has way lower efficiency than Abrams, but they never get the rate of fire buffed. The laser supression system is also missing.
6 Likes
The thing is- as you have seen here, they did send the developers all the information we provided.
The devs just didn’t care about it.
It’s a double edged sword, at least I think so. You are correct that they are merely conveying the developer’s plans. A middle-man for sure.
The flip side to this that we have no other means to communicate our issues and or concerns to the developers. The only true way we can is to hit their bottom line. Or their public image. Which is why the review bombing in May finally brought about a change in the status quo. When developers or executives started seeing gaming news publishers highlight how the game was being handled, that was the singular thing that brought about change.
Where players are feeling frustrated at the community managers, and this is an assumption, is that we feel like that frustration isn’t being clearly communicated to the developers because how could you have this much backlash and not change course? How can you tell your players, after all the sources and effort we put into our bug reports and all the effort we put into these forums posts to bring light to what we view are issues and this is the response you come back to us with, that you are being heard. Because it doesn’t feel like it.
It tells me nothing positive. It doesn’t assure or signal to me that the community managers are actually doing anything. And that’s feels mostly true because we don’t actually know what their progress is. Are they reading every single discussion on this forum? I’d be hard pressed to believe so. Are they reading every single bug report? Again I don’t think so. Or we wouldn’t have bug reports be years old.
So we find ourselves left in the position that our one singular bridge to the developers doesn’t seem like a bridge at all.
2 Likes
I’ve had lists of bugs where I was the sole developer and also the sole bug tester on something, and the “bridge” was me talking to myself, and still had plenty of bugs be years old. Bugs being years old doesn’t mean anything.