Gaijin there better be a document that outright states that DU was never inserted in the SEP, because if there isn’t you are just admitting that you are biased against NATO tanks (and no adding a new shell to distract players doesn’t make up for it).
Why even add the SEPs if you refuse to add the most important reason those upgrades even existed?
3 Likes
Because Russia has to be #1 in-game since their hardware is absolute dogwater IRL.
10 Likes
yeah, im not spending any more money on this game. Tired of the lies from gaijin.
2 Likes
All this “We do not believe” We dont think" Gaijin themselves believe that they are a better source than official US government documents lol.
3 Likes
I can only dream of the day Gaijin admitting they have been biased with their decisions and give all the handicapped vehicles their justice.
It’s not even lies. It feels like the refusal to be proven wrong on certain issues
2 Likes
Then LISTEN to us!
2 Likes
I was thinking of maybe getting a thing or two from the GE sale but this absolute farce from Gaijin has led me to uninstalling the game for the next 3-6 months.
They will get nothing from me. No money and no playtime.
I bet the post about the Abrams production model armor will be as bogus like back then the one about the Maus production model turret armor
1 Like
there isnt a source because even the licence to produce DU inserts in 2006 got changed to include “all” hulls for production, this is a public document on the licencing of said production by the US government.
so even as early as 2006 the US licence the production of DU inserts into Abram hulls, which Abrams no clue but that completely invalidates there claims of “we believe they didnt” upgrade there armour
2 Likes
Any other game developer would understand that this data provided by the community is literally AS GOOD AS IT GETS, therefore Gaijin needs to either
- make educated guesses about actual KE/CE protection on NATO tanks based on the mountain of sources given by the community
- or they need to acknowledge that their gimped representations of abrams/leopards/arietes/merkavas/leclercs are outmatched by the fictional T-series (in the game) and rebalance BRs and ammo accordingly.
Anything else is hypocrisy.
15 Likes
Precisely. Their Russian Bias behavior and coding needs to end.
And it needed to end yesterdecade.
11 Likes
13.0 could already be the new high tier to allow for some decompression for 9.3-11.7.
The Merkavas with a 120mm need faster reloads like the leopard 2’s or even Abrams.
3 Likes
Before anyone pulls up the win loss rates like they always do when “russian bias” is said, all we want is equality for accepting sources, fixing issues, and actually representing at least semi-realistic equipment
3 Likes
Only fools with perks to lose, people completely oblivious and outright liars deny that Russian Bias exists. Everyone else who actually pays attention know that it has for years.
4 Likes
So correct me if I am reading this wrong, but you’re suggesting making the SEPs impervious to all in-game APFSDS on the hull?
1 Like
lol nowhere has he said anything of the sort
Clancy’s Armored Cav puts the 2nd gen DU on a baseline M1A2 at about 800mm KE.
Correct me if I’m wrong but the top performing round in the game is like ~650mm point blank 90 degrees
1 Like
Only in the turret face.
4 Likes
Thanks for the clarification
3 Likes