At this point is more about politics and agendas than just profits
This was the case long before the recent round of sanctions. And having used USA military equipment in combat. It is definitely the best in the world, at least along the length and breadth of the services. Russian stuff vs. USA stuff is like comparing a Yugo to a Maybach.
1 Like
Nope.
Rule number 1. It’s all about the money.
Rule number 2. When in doubt refer to rule number 1.
Even politics needs money to work. I know I’m not going to convince you, but you might want to get off the tinfoil hate channels and start actually trying to learn how corporations and acquisitions processes actually work. I did it for four years. And it’s not a simple thing.
1 Like
De jure no, de facto not at all. Even before 2014.
Personal bias, respectable but you have probably not used anything else to get a better view
Yugo is less likely to break and it’s affordable
How many russian vehicles have them? 10? You said vehicleS so can you name them. Because from my knowledge only the t90m has.
The only thing russian vehicles have and is overperforming is the relikt bullshit. Leopard dominate and thats a NATO vehicle. Usa players keep coping about this, despite the majority of their problems being skill related.
And vikhrs having dual purpose warheads without need to switch + unrealistically accurate FM.
And Pantsir outranging any NATO spaa and having guns for close defense (only US ADATS has secondary gun among all NATO top tier spaa).
MiG27K on release was also a major stinker.
Or do you remember how BMP2M was 8.7 for majority of its life? While were at it, how many NATO IFVs can launch SACLOS missiles while going full speed, just like BMP2M?
Or 2S38 general existence?
There are many unrealistically performing aspects to russian top tier. Not just relikt bags.
4 Likes
And it took a communal uproar for the Leo(1 NATO) and Sweden(Not NATO) to also get them because Gaijin was originally only going to implement it for T-90 - Russia. So out of all the nations in the game, only 3 vehicles have spall liners. However, only 1 NATO vehicle in-game has it. No other NATO countries do despite reality proving otherwise.
And only the Relickt is overperforming, you say?
Lol. Lmfao.
You are comically, objectively wrong on that.
1 Like
If you’re going to parrot this like many others do here atleast provide reliable sources.
Added too early. Despite that it’s radar is bugged to hell, you can abuse this with the f16c or other similar in performance cas.
2 undertiered premiums, what a shocker.
Is this any different from the f16c. Probably the only time russia had good cas, harrier was still probably better.
Only 1 nato vehicle has them? Are you unaware or ignorant? Leos have them, few challengers have them. cv90s(?). You have almost a baseless argument. Yes devs are russian so one might naturally think they are favouring russia, but money seems to have a bigger gravitational force to them. Otherwise russian airplanes would be more often undertiered and artificially buffed like many usaf planes are.
Naturally it seems you cannot read.
No other NATO countries in-game have them implemented in-game. Gaijin said they are " working on it ", which is about as confidence-inducing a statement as a politician promising to end taxation.
The rest of your drivel is objectively bullshit and not worth responding to.
Keep coping, you have 0 arguments. You state only 1 Nato country has them while its 3 or more at this point. Also the amount of shit I’ve seen americans post in this forum in order for the abrams to get spall liners is funny to say the least.
1 Like
The only one coping here is you, but go off I guess.
Keep dancing for us, Jester.
I’m sorry but it’s pretty blatantly clear gaijin has some bias towards Russian vehicles, it’s present in basically every military game. You can see this in western games where the Russians for the most part are shit on. It’s just a fact, by how much is debatable but it’s pretty clear that most Russian vehicles today are far from what the government say they are. And gaijin seem to like giving them the best equipment they could or could not field (t80 thermals) while not allowing simple quality of life changes for nato countries (the complete disregard for any information on nato era and composites).
7 Likes
Until you shoot it’s gun or breech and it just sits there and accepts certain death bc of -3km/h reverse
1 Like
All of that except the turret ring is easy to hit and pen on T-series, sides and lower glacis result in a kill just as often, if not more, than most nato MBTs.
Classic Soviet mains excuse, its boring tbh.
İf you’re in a bad position and you Lost your barrell that is on you cause no tank will manage to escape from death in that kind of situation this has nothing to do with bad reverse.
But lest take a look at T90M’s pros:
-Amazing armor
-One of the best Gun handling(except gun depression)
-One of the best Thermals
-Proper Spall Liners
-Really good shell that has amazing spalling.
T90M’s pros easily exceeds its cons and compare to other nations top tier its superior in many way.
So take your lame excuses aka bad reverse speed and cry at somewhere else please.
2 Likes
It’s a punching bag, sponges damage but usually wont be able to fight back
If by other nations you mean italy and france, yeah lol…
At the same BR the leopard 2a7v does everything the t90m and more but also much better. I wouldn’t take the t90m over the bvm honestly, it’s real advantage over it only the better turret (and some gimicks like commander thermals and LWR). Biggest con is the reload to me then the reverse combined make it extra painful, while also having one of the less penning shells and the worst gun depression on top.
It’s a pretty meh tank for top tier. Not very mobile, easy to hit weakspots, meh firepower, pretty easy to take out.
It’s about equal to the SEPv2, which in turn are worse than the SEPv1, Type 10s and T-80BVM which in turn are far behind the Leopard 2A7V and Strv 122s.
This is over victimizing, its much more then bein punching bag.
İtaly, France, Israel and Britian.
This, you guys always comparing to Leopard2A7V or Strv122 while compeletly ignoring other nations, Russia doesnt have to be best in every category.
T90M might be not top dog but sure as hell its not trash or bad by any means.
İf you think its a meh tank i recommend playing Arietes,Leclerc’s or Merkava’s at top tier.
All of them has bigger weakspots, average mobility while basically bein glass cannon.
İts better then SEPV2 in terms protection and gund handling.
Again comparing to Strv122 or Leo2A7V doesnt make T-90M bad, there are multiple tanks that are worse then T90M on many section.
1 Like