“the individual person isn’t targetted directly” But you still can aim directly at the crew and not the vehicles itself though. To me that doesn’t make it any differrent from shooting at plain infantry holding a gun. That why i said they’re a bit redundant and doesn’t make much sense.
So unless there are blood and gore being show. Those things doesn’t make any differrent to me tbh.
Beside that i think Gaijin could very well adjust / change Pegi rating if they really have to.
But that makes it so that only 16+ can play the game, which could cause a lot of problems considering the age-marker of the raging players that I’m constantly seeing now when they have trouble with the enemy getting them.
I’m sure school has been let out somewhere with the consistency of the rage.
Welp it is what it is. You win some, you lose some.
But maybe just maybe they could tolerate having infantry being shot at to be Pegi13 just without any blood or gore. (they just become tired and sleep on the floor just like tank crew)
Also there are a lot of Pegi12 game that feature people being shot at as well. fortnite being 1 example
It’s Pegi 12, to Pegi 16, there is no Pegi 13.
we wish, unfortunately gore isnt the issue, its the pure fact that you are using military weaponry to gun down a group of soldiers in a “realistic” fashion. or at least it can be interpreted as that
ik just typo thingy
Somehow Armored Warfare with infantry has Pegi 7 rating lmao
Welp we would have to see what Gaijin choose. after all they’re the one who make decision.
Also i have heard that infantry trailer was not april fool joke
In my opinion, this just doesn’t fit in the game. It sounds somewhat fun but it would be probably pretty buggy and not make sense to a lot of people. If they do nothing at all, why add them? If they kinda just run around, they would feel pretty annoying to deal with and with how fast paced the game is, it would be hard for their movements to be realistic, as they would have to be able to move significantly fast. And no offense, but I don’t get the immersion point. If players can run into the infantry, shoot the infantry, do all sorts of stuff to the infantry but they do not die, what point is it to have them run mindlessly?
Sorry for the delay, but Armored Warfare looks to be more of an arcade game (never played it so cant say for sure, but I do know the publisher cause they made Warface) compared to War Thunder, so likely it was just overlooked when they added it or not realistic enough of a game to fall under the category. if it was overlooked, I don’t think the same would happen to War Thunder, considering its… publicity… and being a more popular game.
Welp tbh that doesn’t make much sense that they’ll just overlooked them because they’re not as popular as WT that like “double standard” .
Also as for realistism. when infantry in Armored Warfare get hit there also no blood and gore they just lie down
You should also suggest MG nests and Pillboxes. If a player chooses to destroy them they’ll get some points like if you destroy A.I jets.
Static AT weapons could also be suggested. However, I fear if they make them too inaccurate or too weak, it’ll be unrealistic.
I agree that its a double standard but its necessary, better safe than sorry, as the saying goes