Yes it is passed.
At ru forum you are given a week for your topic to get 100 votes. Otherwise, it goes to the trash, or if moderator take pity, he can pass it.
Like, once my unpopular topic receive only 29 votes. But it was about rework one text alert. And its got passed. And changed (the problem was, one sensless warning shows on the screen for 1-2 minutes at the start of every battle) they remove it.
But my suggestion about Lancer FMP and TRACER SIKA get only 95 votes and go to trash 🤣.
No radar, manually targeted, is basically a baby Falcon.
Turret is from this french SPAAG if you wanted more details on it, AML S530: A Mobile Air Defense Solution
Watch gaijin add it, give it broken ap belt for some reason and put it at 8.3 and then copy past more russian spaa into the uk tree because they “have to fill the gaps”…
There are APDS-rounds chambered in 20x102mm (Mk 149 and Mk 244 APDS). The question is if they cycle in a conventional loading system or if they only work in an auxiliary powered system which they currently only operate in (Phalanx CIWS).
Crazy how they added it to 7.7 with the apds belt, then kept uptiereing it and refusing to just remove the the belt and keep it where it is. They do this all the time, f’up balancing of a vehicle, try to solve the problem with some sloppy fix then abandon it and move on, leaving so many vehicles especially at low tiers either useless, redundant or OP
Armor protection was designed to withstand The Russian 14.5mm heavy MG can penetrate up to 49mm of armor at 10m and 46mm at 100m, so this thing actually has decent armor, at least enough to withstand being attacked by planes with low caliber autocannons