You’re not far off. If you read modification descriptions stock planes are old and worn down. Spaded are restored to full functionality, but not exactly mint condition.
5 Likes
Looks historically accurate for most soviet aircraft to me
1 Like
How can you say you’re biased without saying it outright
show me one pic with oil leaking engine pic
who said to you it supposed to look rugged or something really
Looks the same
I prefer them that way and they usually look that way anyway
ALL??? NATO planes are always clean, while the Su and MiG looks like they’ve been submerged in chlorine for years and then dried in the sun for another 10 years.
how it should be:
2 Likes
You could’ve used a better example, the MiG-25 isn’t too bad.
The Flankers, however… Especially the Navy camos…
2 Likes
Also I stole the layout of your stickers because they look cool.
1 Like
I enjoy creating various layouts; would you like to see some?
Sure. Maybe in the Su-27 thread or DMs?
It could be within the topic, since it involves the aircraft itself. I feel at home in the Su-27 topic; I’ve never seen such a quiet topic with everyone so polite.
It’s up to you. ^^
Wherever you do post 'em, just ping me.
yes i definetly agree with that
This is the best answer, hell even our jets looked like this when they were in service, its just wear and tear of a used vehicle
1 Like
ofc bro
1 Like