yup, the nation known for the biggest marketing lies LMFAO.
2 Likes
2 Likes
In fact, there is an improvement. You use custom files to create custom games in the game, and all aspects are the same as the real gaming experience, except for no network latency.
1 Like
In fact, there is an improvement. You use custom files to create custom games in the game, and all aspects are the same as the real gaming experience, except for no network latency.
The change in center of gravity allows the missile to obtain a larger angle of attack, directly manifested as an improvement in turning ability.
And, StatShark’s simulation level of missiles is actually not perfect, the performance variation amplitude of missiles should be tested within the game. However, despite this, 120C5/C7 and 120D still received real improve And the faster the speed, the turn ratio of AIM-120C5/C7 and AIM-120D will be closer to AIM-120A/B.
‘old’ refers to before the change in center of gravity. ‘new’ refers to the modified version
3 Likes
interesting i would have expected Stat shark to at least show if there was an improvement even if it is not perfect. do you mind if i use these to update the og post? i do not want to miss-lead people and this is good way to give people the right idea about the performance of the missile.
of course
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
i thought so but it actually has been improved just updated the og post check it out for details. still not a reason to buff the ckrackpot missile lol.
Nah it needs buffed. French win rates dipped 10 percent in the past month.
1 Like
where can you find changes done to aim120c/d? i thought it felt better on the dev server but i dont see anyone talking about it
1 Like
I completely agree, and this ends up screwing over every nation and modern addition that isn’t Russian or a Mig-29. It’s ridiculous when they ask for classified documents when there’s a good chance they’ve used Janes as a source at least once.
It’s happening to the Aim-120s and other performance aspects of NATO planes, but it’s also screwing over China hard because there’s so little info directly from the manufacturer that isn’t in a brochure.
4 Likes
look up Data mines on reddit or the WT Snail mines discord. but the change in question was moving the center of mass relative to the fins to 1.75 to match the a/b models.
2 Likes
AIM-120C here is the old 120C
120D is how it is in dev server
dev 120D vs B
1 Like
So still mid but not as abysmally garbage as the old aim12c5.
Quite nice
3 Likes
yeah, it went from the worst, to still the worst, just not by as much
I’ll probably start loading up all 120cs now, instead of taking mostly aim 120b now. Close enough to the 120 b in turning ability while still having better range.
1 Like
im not sure if I will do the same, it still hits slower for close to medium range shots giving them more time to notch
Considering you can joust the D’s at higher angles due to no gimbal limits they could be nice, ofc I’m not talking about launches at 90+ degrees off the nose, those would be wasted for sure.
I think I’ll go full on 12 Aim-120D on the GE, maybe a few A/B’s, but I usually keep my distance with this jet.
1 Like
well the deeper we go into classified part of the modern munitions/system/vehicle, the more gaijin can nerf/buff it as they see fit because there is no data to correct them
and in gaijin eyes, USA dump billions of dollars to make their weaponry worse and are incapable of making anything good :)
6 Likes
i will also be going all120D but with 2 9m’s