Again, Vilkas is not premium, it’s an event vehicle that you would need to Talisman, Shini. Thus it’s not the same as a premium you can just get right off the bat. Show me a autocannon design with anti-air capability that also includes ATGMs and programmable ammunition and exists as a premium you can purchase straight from the store/console.
ok explain to me why the french VBCI-2 has IRST then at 9.7
Serriously IRST has nothing to do with their br. thats you being delusional.
The only reason the cv9035dk doesnt have abm and irst is because the sources provided arent enough/relevant
u might be forgetting as well that gajins initial plan was to put the cv at 10.3 as well
So the VBCI-2 is the only one with programmable ammunition, and yet again, not ATGMs, even though they could be equipped.
Thanks for proving my point.
If you can find more sources to put programmable ammo into the CV9035DK to update it, by all means do so, thank you.
How about we call it, i think my frustration have been answered. What we can tell is that its a consciously decision by Gaijin not to give it ABM, for now, because of lack of information or an active decision for its br.
Sadly yes, Chef. But if you and others can dig up enough information regarding the 35mm on the IFV, supply it to Gaijin as a suggestion, see if you can get it updated.
it has IRST, it lacks the ABM still you arent understanding my point here
And the hell are you even going on about atgms neither cv9035dk or vbci usse or have atgms
its a bushmaster 35mm not a rheinmetall 35mm…
See above statement explaining to Chef his frustration on why it lacks it. It’s a business decision by Gaijin.
ignore the ahead part, just think ABM
they choose a vehicle variant that lacks atgms yes, but that has nothing to do with IRST jesus buddy
I did write to the Danish armed forces but they have stopped giving out information for the time beeing, likely because of the situation in Ukraine. Could try BAE systems tho and SAAB.
Jesus grants patience, but we’re talking to Chef. OK buddy? I’m sorry if my strict explanation is upsetting to you, but I’m explaining to someone about using real money and I can grasp their frustration and upset that the IFV isn’t equipped as they thought it would be.
those mails dont get accepted, we tried for german stuff as well and got official answers.
You need primary sources like declassified manuals, advertising of the producer
or secondary sources like official magazines
If you find out any information that reveals it is possible, I look forward to it. Good luck Chef, Godspeed.
yes but you are giving the completly wrong reasoning thats the problem here.
The reason is there is no sources provided that show ABM capability thats it, not whatever conspiracy you are putting together. The atgms influence br yes. But IRST and ABM seriously doesnt influence it
Besides that the simple reason for lacking ABM currently is that gajin is still in the testing phase after they finaly made it somehow workable
If you say so, I’ll accept it as such. Though I don’t quite follow how programmable fuses don’t affect BR. And also, on a personal note, with as many times as Gaijin has been coding all these ‘new’ technologies in, I’m curious why they haven’t decided on more model fixes instead.
they are ifvs not spaas, the cannon are to slow for them to be used reliably, not mentioning how at 9.7-10.7 nearly everything outranges the ABM in the first place. You get the occasional plane that gets to close but thats it.
Besides that you are propably overestimating its effectiveness. It pretty much only got added this update and still is vastly underperforming. HE-VT is better in all circumstances by quite a lot still.
different dev teams, thats the short explanation sadly
Thank you. That’s is a little saddening, since it seems they have more invested in making new tech and bugging or debugging old codes, rather than model fixes. But I don’t know the company costs or structure or who is assigned to what.
new stuff brings the money thats the thing, oh we fixed this doesnt make good advertisement