That’s not what we are here for big dawg.
Only saying that they will have a great FF option from their own country. They don’t need to get a western option to bolster their lineup.
It’s not about disliking the Chinese or any other nation. But rather how the scenario with further distrust the Top Tier situation.
I am very grateful even if its a C&P people that have been playing for a long time and have everything grinded, then C&P nation would be a respite, has we could finally find another reason to keep grinding. I get tired after 10 or 11 years of playing finally getting another nation or a subt-tree is what gives adrenaline to this old game.
the devs are a bit random so who knows
the weird part is China already has a 179 equivalent so why bend over backwards to give it to them anyway when the UK doesn’t even have fnf helis.
IRL yes, from the datamines though it seems like the french and chinese ones do in game
along with JAGM-MR which they shouldnt (remember how much all the chinese mains where complaining about it getting added to the US one)
Could they at least make an effort of hiding their anti-UK stance at this point? Its almost comical!
We’ll get one after everyone else does. We’re in the habit of queueing and holding the door for others to pass.
Horrible argument. We know nothing abt the HMD and extra ARHs to the F-2 so why would it be added?
The Indo AH-64E is technically compatible and we know it is compatible, so it can be added without needing the Indo Military using them.
If the F2 can carry 4 arh , we know it can carry 6 arh by you logic . Forget the hmd
i dont think thats what i said
Unfortunately, we know IRL it does not have an HMD. Japan has stated it plans to upgrade it with one, but who knows when or if that will happen. They could take the Yak-141’s logic: it never had an IRST but was planned to, so Gaijin gave it anyway.
I really wish this normalization of C&P vehicles to other nations would stop… There are countless numbers of domestically produced vehicles of these nations that deserve to be represented, this is just lazy…
Issue is, we know the IRST it was planned to have and its details. We don’t know the HMD or anything about the HMD that Japan tested (we only have anecdotes) or wants to use.
The Indonesian apache can integrate agm 179 right ? The F2 can also integrate extra two radar missiles on its pylons cuz it can be easily integrated . Your point ?
Can’t say that for air vehicles that much
Not really, it was somewhat speculative even with that aircraft. Especially given its really awkward fit, it conflicts with the radar dome. If it had gotten it IRL, it definitely would have looked different than it does in-game.
We have zero evidence of that? The pylons on the F-2 are well known, we’ve never seen the outer pylons capable of mounting AAM-4s. They would need actual modification of the pylons which makes it ahistorical in game. If you have an image of 6x AAM-4s or proof that the pylons can use them, please send it! Otherwise you’re just asking for AAM-4s on pylons that are known not to have that capability.
Performance-wise atleast, we knew? Just not how it looked.
So the Indonesian apache can’t have agm 179 cuz we don’t know it can integrate and we don’t have pics right ?
The Indonesian AH-64E is bought straight from the US, I’m pretty sure all AH-64Es have the capability. We have no proof that Indonesia straight up removed the capability or asked for it to be removed, we just know that they didn’t use them.