No such thing. It has always been a thing. That is just he most recent of SP changes. Ground ordnance had it’s SP increased for Laser weapons a while back then so on. SP is a normal balancing part for vehicle weapons.
what i was saying is youre quibbling. i never argued against sp being part of balancing normal vehicles loadouts which seems to be part of your strawman argument
i simply said that op vehicles shouldnt be added and then let people access them with sp
they should be added as non op and then for their balancing the sp should be used
this was based on what i originally replied which was buried under your pointless derailing and quibbling
regardless, we should switch the topic back to the apache now that this has been cleared out
OP according to you*
MMW Apache would be fine with chaff/smoke grenades
1 Like
No there is no strawman as much as you would like for me to have. I said.
then you said.
So you are fine with OP systems such as Nukes which will end the game but you are not fine with other systems. You are showing a two tier system for these things. I am saying it’s a double edge sword. You can’t be well this is ok but then go F that.
1 Like
except it wasn’t about adding them with chaff grenades (and aps. you can’t expect tanks to spot apache firing missiles from behind cover at 7km range). it was about adding them now without these and then increasing sp cost to make a difference in accessibility of the op vehicle
yes im fine with the nuke being an “Op system” which is a special case and not fine with normal vehicles being op
false equivalency
also you trying to derail the topic hard
Ok then they can add AH-64E with 38km SPIKE-NLOS and even 16km JAGM-MR (with laser+IR instead of tri-mode seeker)
1 Like
sure after the upcoming sam update
Nah
1 Like
say that to gaijin lol
The same ppl who add Su-30SM with R-77-1 and Kh-38MT before this mythical SAM update? And Rafale with AASM and MICA?
2 Likes
Not worth the time S-200 want’s to be disingenuous with their statements you will be arguing in a circle something I have been doing for a while.
good luck getting the spike nlos though
gaijin already confirmed that multivehicle sams are coming however i don’t see them adding spike nlos any time soon even if they added jet missiles
There are already SPIKE NLOS on an IFV no?
and they didn’t add ah-64e and put them on that!
what ifv is it?
Checking and I am wrong, it’s different types of SPIKE. But what is stopping them from putting better spikes on a higher BR heli when there is AH-60 with 16 of them already? US need a better heli and heli missile combo
yes one that doesn’t have 38km of range
won’t mind the spike er or spike lr2
32
he said 38
I guess you are correct I missed that.
Kh-38MT has more range and is supersonic + launched from better conditions.
AASM has better guidance modes and iirc 70km range. Rafale can carry 6 of those while having very good radar and flight performance.
But oh no, USA get a missile with just over half the range, only IR guided, and slow, and it’s now a huge issue and the game is ruined. I don’t even think 64E can take 16 of them, maybe like 8
1 Like