Well, certainly before the KH-59
1 Like
The mere existence of the KH-38MT is BS, especially since th CM502 was added WITHOUT its modular warhead, aka it not having the advertised HEAT warhead…
A shaped-charge warhead for a 2,000-pound missile? What for? If that missile already destroys everything within a 10-meter radius.
1 Like
is there suggestions for it to be added on existing planes they should be able to carry it if im not bamboozled by some information i read or someone need to do bug report?
f16 and f18c late in game should have it and f15e did test it and its compatible but idk more than this
AGM-84E SLAM on F/A-18C (late) and AGM-84H/K SLAM-ER on F-16C F-15E and F/A-18C late
1 Like
oh nice
Gaijin would find a way to make it no better than the maverick. Most likely outcome is giving it the same lock range since it probably relies heavily on LOAL in real life
1 Like
That would be quite hard to do. Though at closer ranges, say <10km the Maverick will still be better since it is a bit faster there. For any medium to long range (especially lower altitude shots) the SLAM should actually just be faster on average. Low altitude kinematics is quite important I’d say with SPAA just becoming more and more long range and having an easier time shooting down munitions too.
At least for the lock range, the AGM-84E should be exactly the same performance as the IIR Mavericks as they use the same seeker irl. The US “copy pasted” their TV and IIR seekers around a lot so in this case Gaijin would not be incorrect. The same could be true for the SLAM-ER actually, according to the product card of the SLAM-ER, the front is just some cover over what seems like the old Maverick seekerhead:
So don’t expect wonders for the lock range.
Yeah itll basically just be a maverick with a long range GNSS mode unkess gaijin decides to add air to ground datalink
I’m 100% sure this is coming from a dumb tanker who’s never even seen an airplane and has clumsy hands on anti-aircraft guns, lol. Samurai, wake up, you’ve screwed yourself.
Considering your most played vehicle is the 2S38 with a 47% WR, I don’t want to hear it coming from someone who cannot even manage a positive winrate in an overpowered vehicle lmao
Dude, I don’t even need to look at your stats to know you’re a weakling who never moves from spawn. I bought the 2S38 exclusively for squadron battles, and maybe I’ve used it in combined battles. But that’s not much compared to what I’ve driven in this car. So go get some treatment, noob.
1 Like
Moreover, how mentally retarded do you have to be to judge the win rate in our game now? I’ve never laughed so hard. Dude, win rate is completely empty. Go play with Lego.
1 Like
Brother what?
Maybe id agree if matches were much smaller as then individual skill matters more for wins
But when you have 16v16 matches while 70% of the team is typically really bad and nations tend to sway the W/R too with minor nations being favorable this just isnt a accurate metric to use
W/R is not a measure of individual skill in this game theres a reason top squadrons dont interview you based on W/R They interview you on monthly K/D as its more representative of current skill level
Sure sure, WR isn’t a measure when you’re running the 10.3 Russian premium lineup that not only prints SL and RP but is also one of the strongest lineups in the game. The 2S38 is strong enough to skew the chances of a win in your favour which is why everyone asks for it to go up in BR to 10.7. I mean yeah, he just has a decent K/D in it but his obviously not playing for objectives.
My K/D in my Challenger 2F might not be the best but at least I have a decent WR in it too because I play to secure objectives and win instead of farming kills.