Agm-179MR way slower in dev server than irl

Russian game

1 Like

physical evidence Yes But he should exist in reality., not news interviews You can’t be trapped in your own world and convince yourself by ppt. You should know that jagm-mr doesn’t exist. It is only added to the game because of balance, and it doesn’t involve contradictions and hatred between countries or anything else.
He only represents right and wrong
truth or lie
Fact or news report
Existence or non-existence

IMG_4671

1 Like

What are you even arguing?

5 Likes

Dude has gotten lost in the sauce, somehow trying to say that the JAGM-MR is vaporware when its already slated to be produced once lockmart finishes the current testing, and was first tested in 2022, heck, there is even images of the 2022 launch.

The base JAGM is already in active use by the US and, if I am remembering correctly, the UK soon as well, the MR is just a motor section swap that is already well documented to be in development by lockmart and has been used against targets.

The CM502KG has been a mockup on a showroom floor, its at real as the KH-38MT, that being a design shown off but never actually used.

6 Likes

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

I mean there’s literally a picture of the Jagm MR motor test here https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/mfc/pc/jagm/20-12163_TSM_AGMS_JAGM-MR_Product%20Card.pdf
As well as Lockheed confirming successful static firing tests
JAGM-MR: The Future of JAGM | Lockheed Martin
I know you’ve been shown these already but the reality is Gaijin is going take the word of Lockheed Martin over the cope from China’s least delusional nationalist.

7 Likes

Your mental gymnastics are hilarious. This is a game after all buddy lighten up. We have the Panther II, MAUS, KH-38MT. It’s a game not a simulator.

5 Likes

Hurrrrr Durrrr
IMG_5324

4 Likes

First statcards are completely irrelevant to anything in the game (well mass is correct)

You can very easily simluate JAGM performance as it uses hellfire motor while being heavier (and JAGM-MR which is only 1.8kg heavier)

So i added the 1.8kg of propellant (for 20% more impulse) for JAGM-MR and its currently overperforming in game, as it should mostly match the lighter hellfire performance (+ lower drag so it will actually go further)

youre either a clown or bad troll.

1 Like

What if, bear with me here, they improved the propellant as well as increasing the amount

1 Like

They tested JAGM-MR in the only real China: China Lake Testing Range, California

US finally gets something modern and some players can’t cope with it

6 Likes

Drinking some kool-aid improves your performance!

We haven’t improved rockets since the 1960s. Rocket Science isn’t magic, its very simple.

The improvements from aim9b to aim9x is 100% from dry mass (warhead and electronics) and making the missile bigger with some aerodynamic improvements (seeker is smaller allowing more efficient front end shape)

Cool simulation and all, but the JAGM-MR uses a new motor , which lets it reach 16km from static/ground launch.

4 Likes

Material science is constantly improving, and guess what rocket motors are made out of?

Your straight up wrong about the 9X by the way

3 Likes

it uses “different motor” which is 1.8 kg heavier, so i added that to propelant mass, and no it doesnt make it go forever, it only gives 20% more impulse which as you see in the table makes it match delta V of the hellfire which has lighter front-end

We dont know precisely what changed. Who knows where they managed to shed weight to pack more into the booster.
What we do know is what they tell us.
If they say it can go 16km , then it probably can (of course , you have to take all data with a grain of salt, no way to know if they underappreciated or over appreciated that value.

2 Likes

But it has exactly the same front end across JAGM and JAGM-MR so it is exactly the same dry mass. The only difference is slightly extended by that 2kg of propellant