as is the F-35
1 Like
And quite a bit of its air, and literally every naval unit
After Greece and Cyprus goes to Israel, I honestly think we should be fine with subtrees.
I would much rather see more independent trees, even if it takes more time to implement.
(I can also assure you all the listed nations you suggested have far more to offer)
2 Likes
Would not agree on “more sub-trees” but “better representation of present sub-trees”.
You don’t get bored because you grind the same “host” nation, e.g. Germany, Sweden, the US or any other “major” tt. You get bored because what is more or less accessible for grinding/playing without extensive use of real $ is the same thing all around the place.
Finnish sub-tree made Sweden afford wider line-ups, especially if devs get around the actual Finnish SPAAs to fix low-tier Bofors AA problem. However, the TT itself has only 3 domestic(ly modified) (see as “unique”) vehicles (you can kind of count T-55M there with Belgian APFSDS, but otherwise it is 1:1 Soviet T-55M). Out of a dozen represented in researchable category. Those being BT-42, Vickers Mk.E and Leo2 Marksman. 2 of which low-tier that people tend to skip.
Finland can offer a good variety of tanks and other armored vehicles with their unique traits (see Swedish/Finnish armored vehicles thread). But devs take the C&P route as all it takes is copy the model, code and only change the livery and TT location. And that’s not the Finnish problem only.
All existing sub-trees, like Hungarian, Romanian, Thai, Indian, BeNeLux and the other officially declared sub-trees suffer from the same issue. You only see unique vehicles in the premium category (the infamous Finnish air sub-tree, that is actually located in the premium section and not researchable one).
If unique sub-tree additions were not 90% of the time event or premium, you wouldn’t need more and more sub-trees, but the proper representaion of the exisiting ones. The only proper sub-tree to this day is SA in the UK TT.
Look at what you get there in research tab, and you will understand why the current concept of sub-tree and treatment of it is not as effective and refined as it should be nowadays.
4 Likes
I’d like to see more sub tree, never really cared about seeing new independent trees but two or three.
Korea, Yugoslavia and a Middle Eastern tree of some sort.
And Poland 💪💪💪
Why in the hell would we be for Germany (Denmark) take that horrible opinion and shove it
Yes because we have had such good relations with the country that invaded us and killed people what a wonderful idea.
Hell you could’ve spent even 10 seconds seeing who were have ties to and it wouldn’t be Germany its NORDEFCO care to point to the German flag?
Screw off for that excuse
We aren’t German property, Germany shouldn’t have us
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I dont care lmao regardless it irritates me that people dont use any form of brain power before stating something like this.
He wants Denmark because he thinks the Germans and us are close but proceeded to do no basic research to see who we are the closest to in terms of allies or history.
Exactly im tired of dumb teammates
The joke got flaged lol.
Anyway.
Ye, at times it seems as if people just make a post with first thought on problem they have, and some of them get offended when people point out mistakes.
Like, I wanted to make in-depth post on 2A4M. For like month or so Im on 4 pages long draft thats being constantly reworked as I test things.
Hell, ive been sitting on article on RISE (P) since last february.
I wish I had the confidence to just send them out to the world without care.
1 Like
anything but stop screwing the anzacs and canadians
2 Likes
I have read the comments in here, I know something is wrong, remember this is just an opinion, if you have an opinion, feel free to comment here.
The comments in here is just goofy, escpecially the Denmark thing, please yall just chill out.
Yall dont need to be running around saying your opinion is better, different or any other reasons, just be respectful, you may get flagged lol.
Denmark is already a part of Sweden.
South Korea is planned as part of a Korean TT coming Soon™ as per the Community Chat 8
Philippines could end up as Israel, but they are getting Greece and Cyprus first (same as above). So I could see Philippines going to the US
3 Likes
Personally i like to think of it as Sweden is a part of Danmark but thats Semantics
Dont you mean South Norway :P
2 Likes
Tbf maybe if you were Danish you’d get it but its like every other week we have some German main trying to claim they own us and half the time its them responding with well we need your jet and sweden doesn’t while ignoring our history so do try to understand you saying you want Denmark for the same Leopard Germany can already get is a bit annoying given i have to see this crap literally every other day.
Already had some Germans claim denmark should be a subtree since they took us over in WW2 post got closed so yes im going to be annoyed when someone else suggests something like that
what do you mean denmark to germany
its a nordic nation and alreagy assigned to sweden
1 Like