Where’d all the technical mods go?
22 Likes
The Abrams turret might actually be able to survive 1980s USSR tank threats? Who would have guessed!?
3 Likes
Very unlikely.
The mantlet of the M1 Abrams was only rated to protect against 115mm APFSDS at 800 metres distance.
3BM-26 is plausible at significant range, 3BM-32 is virtually guaranteed to penetrate at any range, same for 3BM-42.
Pictured: 3BM22 entered service in 1976 able to pen through the part that is currently modeled as empty space and kill crew on a tank (M1A1 HC) that entered service in 1990. You’d think that surplus soviet ammunition would be on the list of penetrators the tank crew should survive on a turret hit while in a hull down position. Because that’s the threat the US was fighting in the middle east.
2 Likes
You previously said ‘‘Abrams turret’’, now you’re talking about the mantlet/gun shield of an M1A1 HC instead.
You need to be a bit more specific with what you’re referencing.
I already linked to a bug report that I made concerning the mantlet, it is currently underperforming but it is not known to precisely what degree.
1 Like
I’ll let that one slide but you know what I meant when I said turret. It’s rather pedantic to jump on someone for not knowing the jargon for each esoteric named zone when it is on the turret itself.
A large amount I believe. Gaijin believes the whole underside of the mantlet modeled like it’s sheet metal with a 25.4mm flat rate. It’s really like 6" thick at the smallest point but I don’t have “proof”
It should be something like this all around the lower mantlet except for where the gun itself is
3 Likes
Crazy times we’re living in.
Yeah, I thought you meant the… Turret.
Things have names for a reason, and the name of the part you were looking for is in the very title of this thread :P
Guess they don’t want anything to do with this thread
9 Likes
They saw Abrams in the title and thread is auto - “ignored” in every moderator/technical :D
11 Likes
Funny how they wanted real evidence… You find it… Silence… After claiming ohh well the model in game is the same as real life lol
3 Likes
After the “spall liners” thread can you blame them?
7 Likes
Hey hey… That was top quality comedy
I thought its gonna be " Hey we got that part but we need numbers and info about its filling- not a bug" thingy but complete silence ? Haha
3 Likes
Silence indeed. These too
Abrams Turret basket is a seperate component
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/cHv8RM6tfvNo
Abrams oil pump location is wrong with sources and proof
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/pVl3yYdklDQZ
The devs/mods are clearly coping. Turret ring is still not volumetric after years lmfao. They fixed the Arena’s volumetric armor the day after it was on the live server. Such beta energy from them
15 Likes
this one is a gem, a certified gaijin classic:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9pd3QSYFMjsV
accepted 10 months ago lol
6 Likes
They really did just go dark in this thread….wow
6 Likes
Remember the KH-38MT thread?
Welcome to that, again.
3 Likes
Damn thats crazy
They ask for proof now they get it and they ignore it…
5 Likes