Syrian T122, T-34-122 Howitzer

Suggestions Ground
1
[Would you like to see this in-game?]
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

History:

After suffering defeats against Israel in 1967 and Jordan in 1970, Syria tried to rebuild its military into a more modern and effective force. In 1970, when Hafez Al-Assad took power, he would push for rapid military reform with Soviet support and reorganizing the army.

One of Syria’s biggest lessons was the importance of mobile artillery that could keep up with tanks during fast-moving battles, however, due to Syria lacking enough modern self-propelled guns from the Soviet Union, Syrian engineers would instead improvise, by combining outdated T-34 tanks with D-30 122mm howitzers.

The plan was for a modernization of the T-34-85 into a self-propeled gun which was overseen by the Syrian General Staff’s Transportation Directorate, with specialists from the Artillery and Armored Directorates participating in the designing and engineering. The tanks were converted at the Artillery school in Qatanaha and at the Armored School in Al-Qaboun. The D-30 gun was mounted ontop of the roof of the frontal hull, firing to the rear. This design required minimal modifications to the hull, saving time and money.

The first step for the modernization was the removal of the turret. With a radical design of the hull not being planned, however since the tanks weren’t new, the engines and transmissions were removed for inspection and repair. Five steel ammunition boxes were then installed on the sides of the hull.

Next, a lowerable working platform for the gun crew was mounted above the front armor plate, while for the hull roof, a steel platform was welded onto the front section above the sloped front armor plate. 36 centimeter high armor shields were constructed around the turret opening. The air intakes, radiator grilles and engine air intakes were covered with armor. The last steps of the modernization that were needed was to install the new engine and transmission, with ammunition storage and crew seats being installed inside the hull, with the gun being installed shortly after.

nug91es7xne51-2365979204
nug91es7xne51-23659792041024×683 197 KB

32604412387_713103ee0f_b-1678015168
32604412387_713103ee0f_b-16780151681024×683 349 KB

t-34_122_sph_004_of_120-3989975954
t-34_122_sph_004_of_120-39899759541600×1200 546 KB

t-34_122_sph_032_of_120-3247884704
t-34_122_sph_032_of_120-32478847041600×1200 329 KB

800px-D-30-howitzer-on-T-34-batey-haosef-1-3418734553
1460700409_t-34-1817663906
S1234001
S1234002

Armament:

D-30 122mm howitzer
ANA_Artillery_Demonstration_(5050655391)

The D-30 has a RPM of 5-6 and has an elevation of -7° to 70° degrees.

Normally, the D-30 was capable of a 360° degree field of fire in combat, however the T-34’s gun’s aiming arc was limited to 12°.

The vehicle itself was capable of carrying up to 120 rounds of ammunition, 80 inside the hull and 40 in ammunition boxes located on the sides.

Mobility:

The vehicle was powered by a V-2 series 12-cylinder diesel-fueled engine of 493 horsepower, and had a road speed of 55 kph or 34 mph.

Structure:

It had a crew of 7, and had a length of 6.3m/20.7 feet and was 3m/9.8 feet wide.

Sources:

https://vadimvswar.narod.ru/ALL_OUT/TiVOut9801/S1234/S1234001.htm

1 Like
2

that’s all i want to hear, +1

2 Likes
3

It’s so original…120 rounds for 122 mm gun, on this thing.
So archer but worse, open top, with ammunition being outside, i don’t believe 80 rounds could be inside, 8 km/h forward and 5-6 rpm, i don’t think gajing will make reloading 122 mm Soviet gun so fast, it won’t be better that 3 rpm and 4 rpm with aced reload.

+1

4

+1 for T-34/Archer

They might, as they tend to give open-top vehicles (and simply spacious turret/casemate designs) a reload speed increase since we are not dealing with cramped space, especially with such vehicle.

Moreover, as per Gaijin, reload rates are balancing values, therefore they might as well give <10 second reload to justify BR placement

4 Likes
5

better, it’s way more mobile and reactive, plus it has a 122 so overpressure.

1 Like
6

problem is that the crew is operating outside of the vehicle.

7

Cubans have a very similar vehicle using an M-46 cannon.

image

There are several problems with these SPGs from a War Thunder perspective. First, their guns face toward the rear of the vehicle, meaning that in order to engage an enemy in front of you, the vehicle would need to stop and rotate a full 180 degrees. This would be an awkward task for a T-34, and Gaijin may even need to create a separate mechanic to properly model this (as every time you stop moving, the vehicle will attempt to do a 180 with the current mechanics).

Second, the boxes mounted along the sides are ammunition storage crates. This would make the SPG extremely vulnerable, as even 7.62 mm machine-gun fire could potentially trigger an ammunition cook-off and destroy the SPG instantly.

These SPGs are certainly interesting, but only for fooling around.

2 Likes
8

Exploding ammo, ask 2S19, i once hit its ammo with main gun few times and it didn’t exploded and even protected crew from damage. Hopefully they fixed this non sense.

9

So its an IS-6 gun, on a T-34, with absolutely no armor?
+1 seems like 5.7 or 6.0 material