You have to remember that I didn’t come to a conclusion on Puma vs 2S38 cause I don’t find them comparable.
It should be Puma vs BMP-2M and other low-caliber weapon systems such as the new Japanese wheeled vehicles.
And Puma should probably be a lower BR than BMP-2M, while higher than the Japanese vehicles.
It’s possible decompression among low-caliber vehicles should occur.
@Matthgame231
Stryker is not a tank, and it’s power to weight ratio makes it slower.
Mobility, ammunition [which includes post-pen], and optics.
Everything else it’s on-par except for thermal generation as that’s the only thing where HSTVL’s age comes as a factor.
2S38 has better optics having 4.0x-9.4x while HSTVL has 2.0x-8.0x zoom.
Also has 6x more ammunition.
Nothing is on par.
HSTVLs post pen damage is almost non-existent
For anti-tank, reloads lower than 2.0 when penetration is over 200mm just flat out doesn’t matter. Either you pen on first shot or you don’t, and follow up shots take out the rest of the vehicle.
2 > 4 for minimum zoom, and 8/9.4 is effectively the same for maximum zoom.
Ammunition count matters for aircraft.
2S38’s post-pen is less than half of that of HSTVL’s, so any take you have on its post pen, your take on 2S38’s is still going to be that 2S38’s round is worse.
I adopted the “penning is better than relying on post-pen” attitude in 2019.
So yeah, I don’t care about post-pen personally which is why most of my posts in 2023 has me not caring about people focusing so much on post pen cause I was unintentionally being a tad rude forgetting to take into consideration their preferences in that regard.
I bring APCR in the 90mm tanks cause they’re the best pen, and penning to frag a cannon breech, ammo, or gunner is more important than bouncing with an inferior penning round.
90mm APCR are the only APCR with more pen than APCBC.