I bought 90105 back when it was TML. Sometimes i miss the old version, but upgraded one is just 🤌🤌🤌. Exquisite vehicle for a quick and maneuverable gameplay, and it has a Ukrainian ATGM, which gives an additional point of messing with armoured doodles
1 Like
Both are very different in the ways it can be applied in a match, while being similar for some people. CV 90105 have huge advantages when comes to gun handling and firepower, being able to respond with fire faster than the 2S25M.
Being a tank destroyer, 2S25M isn’t the best vehicle for aggressive-style gameplay, the best option is getting far behind in distant ambush positions, the mobility and the cannon should help with it, which doesn’t mean the vehicle itself is worse than the CV 90105,
For comparison, the mobility is similar, the firepower in the CV 90105 is far better not to say the gun handling, Cockerill 3105 is a good weapon station compared to the 2S25M, trade the damage for quicker response to threats but doesn’t mean it’s worse.
If you’re choosing a vehicle, the best option is the CV 90105 being the best out of the two vehicles which you’ll have great advantages in hilly maps like Second Battle of El Alamein and Mozdok regarding gun depression and other aspects such as silhouette.
I really like the 2S25M great fcs with thermals for gunner and commander also 12.0 shell in 10.0 means you have no issue penetrating anything. Main draw back I would give the sprut is its horrific gun elevation speed even with a level 150 and aced crew it’s only 3.5/s
Ok so I need to play both I assume ? I gotta grind ussr from scratch and gotta buy the 90105
I’m just saying that neither of them are bad, just how you must apply them is different despite similarty, but if I had to choose one it would be the CV 90105, it let you focus on aggressive gameplay as well in defensive as the 2S25M, you really don’t need the 2S25M unless you want it.
aight thanks