Jump to content

New BR changes feel incredibly out of touch


338069781_BRchanges.thumb.jpg.a48e8b23dc

  • Imagine downtiering the German M48 when it was already the best 7.0 in the game
  • Imagine downtiering the T-80B when the T-72B 1989 is like ten times worse
  • Imagine leaving the T-64A at 9.3 when every single German 9.0 is better
  • Imagine downtiering the Object 120 when the T-54 1949 is like ten times worse
  • Imagine putting the T-44-100 at the same BR as the T-34-100

This has to be the worst round of BR changes yet, and I'm speaking as someone who plays a lot of these newly downtiered vehicles...

  • Upvote 22
medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, watch_your_fire said:

338069781_BRchanges.thumb.jpg.a48e8b23dc

  • Imagine downtiering the German M48 when it was already the best 7.0 in the game
  • Imagine downtiering the T-80B when the T-72B 1989 is like ten times worse
  • Imagine leaving the T-64A at 9.3 when every single German 9.0 is better
  • Imagine downtiering the Object 120 when the T-54 1949 is like ten times worse
  • Imagine putting the T-44-100 at the same BR as the T-34-100

This has to be the worst round of BR changes yet, and I'm speaking as someone who plays a lot of these newly downtiered vehicles...

German M48 shouldn´t be there .... look at the American M48

nothing to say

Youre Right

nothing to say

the T44 100 needed that (don´t forgett the T34-100 is a premium so normal people need to pay for it) , would like it if similiar tanks get a downtier as well now.

medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, RaymondCChan said:

T80B has a winrate of 35% and KD 1.0 on TS, that may be the reason.

I'm not saying the T-80B doesn't deserve a downtier to 9.7, it probably does, but it's so silly to leave the T-72B '89 at 10.0 when it doesn't even have thermals and is way slower

medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This round is definitely one of the most questionable decision making process. Hopefully they correct themselves according to the people who actually play the game, there needs to be a 2nd or even 3rd round before implementation.

Edited by ColdMatches

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TheKomrade said:

It's just posted like few hours ago... You people moaning already, none of that is 100% sure.. 

Knowing Gaijin, they almost certainly follow through with it.

  • Upvote 1
medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TheKomrade said:

It's just posted like few hours ago... You people moaning already, none of that is 100% sure..

Given the fact that it is tittled January BR changes and we have only 1 week left, there is not much time for them to change mind.

 

Most of those changes except EBR and turretless TDs is crazy.

 

German M48 should have gone to 7,3 and Gaijin should have made another tank for German 6,7, this is just lazy solution. T-80 should not go down, but max BR should go up.

 

Panther F going down, it does not really matter much as it will be uptiered almost all the time anyway.

 

Why they still do not plan decrease of T-34-85s is beyond my understanding.

  • Upvote 2
medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, TheKomrade said:

It's just posted like few hours ago... You people moaning already, none of that is 100% sure.. 

 

OK then, give us a recent example where Gaijin did not go through with a tank BR change due to player pressure.

  • Like 1
medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, qpranger said:

 

OK then, give us a recent example where Gaijin did not go through with a tank BR change due to player pressure.

I can only think of Leopard 2K to 9.3. That was quite a long time ago, tho.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Privat_Moritz said:

T44 100 needed that

xDD Yes, is needed because i want more kill in that tank. More SL for me :D

48 minutes ago, Thodin said:

T-80 at 9.7 .... this is .....

but waaaait, T-64B is ... 9.7 too :D So, T-64B = T-80B ? :D no progress, nice 

 

Next one : Panther F, why ? 5.7 ? :D So, there is a one panther nerfed some time ago. First, change to lower BR, next : increase repair cost. Balance by Gaijin hahaha :D

1 hour ago, watch_your_fire said:

Imagine downtiering the Object 120 when the T-54 1949 is like ten times worse

Hahaha bro, there is something Gaijin War Thunder : Return of the OPiekt 120 :D

May the russian force be with us :D

1 hour ago, RaymondCChan said:

T80B has a winrate of 35% and KD 1.0 on TS, that may be the reason.

It's because T-80B go uses in match as 3th-4th tank. If u use so much tank, you are probably lost game :x simple

 

This changes is evidence for that, Gaijin have us, players, in their ases :)

 

medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, qpranger said:

 

OK then, give us a recent example where Gaijin did not go through with a tank BR change due to player pressure.

G 91 YS , than the BR changes after the one they made it 10.0

Just now, StaszekJones said:

xDD Yes, is needed because i want more kill in that tank. More SL for me :D

 

If you need kills play CW-21 :D

medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Privat_Moritz said:

G 91 YS , than the BR changes after the one they made it 10.0

 

When did it become a tank?

medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe Gajin should postphone those changes and think it over.

 

M-48 at br 6.7

JPZ at BR 6.3

T-80 at BR 9.7 (omg)

etc...

 

It just makes no sense to mix all those different eras into each other. WW2 + Cold War at 6.7 / 6.3  is just iffy. Seperate it. T-64 = T-80 .... umm how about no?

 

Some vehicles are just bad. Doesn't really matter if you lower their BRs. Like PT-76, which is now 5.3 and annoys WW2 tank players. AND its still just bad for most situations. Do you want to do the same for other HEAT FS slingers, just because they are bad? Using statistics for everything just means we will soon have even more Cold war vehicles in WW2 matches. This kills all immersion and  those vehicles won't even perform better.

Edited by Thodin
medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Thodin said:

JPZ at BR 6.3


Well a hugely superior Light sits at 6.7.. Since the RU won't go up then something had top give, especially stock with that APCR horror show.. I might actually bother spading mine now.  I mean, Allies are being shafted so gets more tempting to just stick to Axis (Germany for me), it is only my lack of up to date aircraft that put me off going too much higher in Germany.

Edited by Deranger79
medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Privat_Moritz said:

You didn´t specify on tanks so ...

 

Oh yes I did.

medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, watch_your_fire said:

I'm not saying the T-80B doesn't deserve a downtier to 9.7, it probably does, but it's so silly to leave the T-72B '89 at 10.0 when it doesn't even have thermals and is way slower

T-72 1989 has slightly better stats, winrate 37.63% and KD 1.05. And if it does go down to 9.7, the Russian lineup would be too strong. What I find problematic is that M1 Abrams still siting at 10.0.

  • Upvote 1
medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...