Stona

Server Update (12.11.2019)

bomber.jpg

  • In “Ground Strike” missions, the models of target bases have been changed.
  • In “Ground Strike” missions, the number of target bases has been increased from 3 to 4.

The current provided changelog reflects the major changes within the game as part of this Update. Some updates, additions and fixes may not be listed in the provided notes. War Thunder is constantly improving and specific fixes may be implemented without the client being updated.

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Increasing the number of target bases has been suggested by many players, but only to minimise the effect of their paramount request, which is to buff bombers. Can we expect an update soon to implement what they really want, to give heavy bombers a better chance to achieve their purpose?

  • Upvote 3
medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Light_Flight said:

Increasing the number of target bases has been suggested by many players, but only to minimise the effect of their paramount request, which is to buff bombers. Can we expect an update soon to implement what they really want, to give heavy bombers a better chance to achieve their purpose?

you mean targets that aren't behind enemy lines but off in the corners of the map?

Edited by RedLinesBurn
medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, *KnightsCross20 said:

And this change to the models of said bases means what exactly? 

This is how they look now:

20191112202831_1.jpg.78d02eed83db4291cd9

It's similar to the old model but much more detailed and with more buildings.

 

10 hours ago, Light_Flight said:

Increasing the number of target bases has been suggested by many players, but only to minimise the effect of their paramount request, which is to buff bombers. Can we expect an update soon to implement what they really want, to give heavy bombers a better chance to achieve their purpose?

Do you mean that bombing bases and airfields is quite useless unless the airfields are actually destroyed which like never happens? Yes I agree. Destroyed bases should reduce the tickets much more. Maybe every bomb on a base or airfield should reduce the points a bit instead of only a fully destroyed base.

medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, TinyTinkerTank said:

This is how they look now:

20191112202831_1.jpg.78d02eed83db4291cd9

It's similar to the old model but much more detailed and with more buildings.

Ok. Interesting that, that is something they worked on. Not much of a change really. 

 

7 hours ago, TinyTinkerTank said:

Do you mean that bombing bases and airfields is quite useless unless the airfields are actually destroyed which like never happens? Yes I agree. Destroyed bases should reduce the tickets much more. Maybe every bomb on a base or airfield should reduce the points a bit instead of only a fully destroyed base.

Guess you don’t fly in 4.0 BR range. Me264’s have been taking AF’s fairly regularly.

Surprised they hadn’t added a fourth base, or used the Ruhr map DM, before this. Agreed, partial damage should also count to rocket bleed. But it’s always been a touchy subject as far as that goes. You see with maps like Normandy, where if you are not careful on the Axis side, 2-3 attackers can drain your tickets before the air battle even begins. 

medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.