Standalone Swedish Ground forces tree

[Wolf_89 2,487]

5 hours ago, rasmusloow said:

Do you know if the UDES 15/16 was build? The other tank game says it was build and some information dont know if it was build or not. 

"full-scale prototype was built" = mockup. Not a functional tank.

[PrussianOwl 435]

Rumor has it, Sweden's the next nation to be added to the game

[Solarmod 1,199]

+1, Sweden needs rep.

[______BlackCat13 342]

Definitely down to burn money on this tree

[kamikazi21358 998]

I bet the new German event tank is a test for the Stridsvagn 103.  We had hydropneumatic suspension for awhile now, now they’re testing tanks without horizontal gun traverse...

[Solarmod 1,199]

On ‎05‎/‎10‎/‎2019 at 14:18, kamikazi21358 said:

I bet the new German event tank is a test for the Stridsvagn 103.  We had hydropneumatic suspension for awhile now, now they’re testing tanks without horizontal gun traverse...

I agree.

[Wiggly_Armed_Man 2,383]

With a Swedish air tree being introduced in 1.95 and two Swedish premium planes in 1.93, it's likely a ground tree is coming now.

[Wolf_89 2,487]

4 minutes ago, Wiggly_Armed_Man said:

With a Swedish air tree being introduced in 1.95 and two Swedish premium planes in 1.93, it's likely a ground tree is coming now.

Ground tree will come at a later date. Not this year. If i understood Shawn correct. Hope we don't have to wait until December 2020.

[Solarmod 1,199]

I'm still confused as to why we don't have the Swedish King Tiger as a premium in this line 

[Sp15 265]

On 24/10/2019 at 19:36, Solarmod said:

I'm still confused as to why we don't have the Swedish King Tiger as a premium in this line 

I mean it was only ever used as a range target....

And i dont think we have so few premium options we have to resort to that kind of vehicle any time soon.

[Milocat 4,829]

Looking forward to getting this!  

[Solarmod 1,199]

On 25/10/2019 at 16:19, Sp15 said:

I mean it was only ever used as a range target....

And i dont think we have so few premium options we have to resort to that kind of vehicle any time soon.

Really? Guess I had some things wrong then 

[Wolf_89 2,487]

On 29/10/2019 at 16:06, Solarmod said:

Really? Guess I had some things wrong then 

We only bough the Tiger 2P and think at least 1 Panther. Just to studies them. And then shoot the crap out of them.

Some info on the Swedish Tiger 2

http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/coldwar/Sweden/SwedishKonigstiger

[Solarmod 1,199]

17 minutes ago, Wolf_89 said:

We only bough the Tiger 2P and think at least 1 Panther. Just to studies them. And then shoot the crap out of them.

Some info on the Swedish Tiger 2

http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/coldwar/Sweden/SwedishKonigstiger

Yeah, I did some research on it 

[Xenecrite 898]

@Sp15

Say I have a question for you
Do you plan to add vehicles from Norway or Finland?
Just to know

[Miss_Behaven 313]

For the Nordic Tree: Please notice the 105 mm. L7A1 gun. 

 

	Front view, left side Picture courtesy of Ole S. Olsen, Vangede via Brian Brodersen
Danish Army Specific: The Centurion MK III (shown) was received as part of the MDAP program in 1953, some of them allegedly after participating in the Korea War. Some were mounted with the "A-gun" (shown) and the remainder featured the "B-gun" (88 kb).. To compensate for the notorious fuel-consumption a fuel-trailer was delivered along with the MBT. In 1954 the Besa MG was replaced by a Browning cal. 7.62 and was designated MK V. In 1959 a 12.7 mm Browning turret MG was mounted. In 1964 106 tanks with the "A-gun" was modified with the British 105 mm L7A1 gun and the 7.62 cal. Browning was replaced by the German MG 62 (Mk V, 2). From 1973 the Danish Centurions used a Danish produced track from Varde Stålfabrik A/S. 90 tanks was further upgraded with laser range finder and night vision equipment in 1985 (Mk V, 2 DK).

Edited November 13, 2019 by Miss_Behaven

[WayOfTheWolk 1,570]

2 hours ago, Miss_Behaven said:

For the Nordic Tree: Please notice the 105 mm. L7A1 gun. 

 

	Front view, left side Picture courtesy of Ole S. Olsen, Vangede via Brian Brodersen
Danish Army Specific: The Centurion MK III (shown) was received as part of the MDAP program in 1953, some of them allegedly after participating in the Korea War. Some were mounted with the "A-gun" (shown) and the remainder featured the "B-gun" (88 kb).. To compensate for the notorious fuel-consumption a fuel-trailer was delivered along with the MBT. In 1954 the Besa MG was replaced by a Browning cal. 7.62 and was designated MK V. In 1959 a 12.7 mm Browning turret MG was mounted. In 1964 106 tanks with the "A-gun" was modified with the British 105 mm L7A1 gun and the 7.62 cal. Browning was replaced by the German MG 62 (Mk V, 2). From 1973 the Danish Centurions used a Danish produced track from Varde Stålfabrik A/S. 90 tanks was further upgraded with laser range finder and night vision equipment in 1985 (Mk V, 2 DK).

Here are some additional photos

 

[rasmusloow 74]

It looks beautiful! 

(Yes this is real, not fake)

Edited November 15, 2019 by rasmusloow

[Wolf_89 2,487]

5 hours ago, rasmusloow said:

It looks beautiful! 

(Yes this is real, not fake)

But they got the name wrong. Its IKV 72. Not IKV 91 like they said in the interview

But i'm hyped for my Swedish bias

[Stridswombat 1,088]

8 hours ago, Wolf_89 said:

But they got the name wrong. Its IKV 72. Not IKV 91 like they said in the interview

But i'm hyped for my Swedish bias

I'm not sure how they managed that feat for 2 wildly different vehicles. They're nearly as far apart as they can be.

[Alan_Tovarishch 860]

I have updated my Swedish ground forces TT for BR 7.7 and up. Only two vehicles listed would be a little controversial from the historical point of view, the rest are all real.

 

	MBT	MBT	LT	IFV	TD	SPAA	PREMIUM
7.7	Strv 101	Emil E1			PvBv 2063 (TOW)	LvKv 42
8.0			Ikv-91	Strf 9025
8.3	Strv 102R	KRV			UDES 33 (TOW-1 630mm)	VEAK 40	Strv 74 Rb.52
8.7	Strv 104	Strv 103A		Strf 9040
9.0		Strv 103B					Strv 102 Rh 10,5
9.3	Strv 105 A/T	Strv 103C			Pvrbv 551 (TOW-2 900mm)	Lvrbv 701
9.7		Strv 103D	Ikv-105	Strf 9040B
10	Strv 121 "B"						NM142 (TOW-2)
10.3	Strv 121 "C"					Lvrbpbv 4016
10.7	Strv 122 A			Strf 9040C	Pvrbbv 452 (3xRBS-56)		Strf 9040/56
11.0	Strv 122 B		CV90120
11.3	Strv 122 C

 

[Sp15 265]

Lvrbpbv 4016? are you sure thats a real thing? also for all intents and purposes the 122 and 121 versions would have identical performance ingame, only exception is the one with the updated armor pack. Also using a project EMIL design in the tree is really stretching it since only the later version KRV was built and only the hull at that. I have stayed away from suggesting the krv for this reason, remember Gaijin have been removing partially built tanks.

[Alan_Tovarishch 860]

53 minutes ago, Sp15 said:

Lvrbpbv 4016? are you sure thats a real thing? 

Yes. MTLV chassis (=Shturm-S) with RBS-70 AAM

Spoiler

 

 

53 minutes ago, Sp15 said:

 also for all intents and purposes the 122 and 121 versions would have identical performance ingame, only exception is the one with the updated armor pack

That would be the same as to say the Leo 2A4 and 2A5 are the same but with different armor. Strv 121 are Leo 2A4 (both pre 1987 and post 1987, meaning that we could have different variants with "B" or "C" armor) leased by Germany to Sweden.

 

53 minutes ago, Sp15 said:

Also using a project EMIL design in the tree is really stretching it since only the later version KRV was built and only the hull at that. I have stayed away from suggesting the krv for this reason, remember Gaijin have been removing partially built tanks.

I agree with all that. But since KRV is so unique i wish Gaijin made an exception. Stuff like E100 is also ingame but also was never completed.

Edited November 15, 2019 by Alan_Tovarishch

[WayOfTheWolk 1,570]

1 hour ago, Sp15 said:

Lvrbpbv 4016? are you sure thats a real thing? also for all intents and purposes the 122 and 121 versions would have identical performance ingame, only exception is the one with the updated armor pack. Also using a project EMIL design in the tree is really stretching it since only the later version KRV was built and only the hull at that. I have stayed away from suggesting the krv for this reason, remember Gaijin have been removing partially built tanks.

Gaijin has recently confirmed that paper ships are coming to the game, it doesn't really matter anymore whether they were built or not. As long as there are definitive blueprints for the turret and gun available there should not be too much of an issue implementing the KRV in War Thunder.

[Sp15 265]

58 minutes ago, Private_Wolk said:

Gaijin has recently confirmed that paper ships are coming to the game, it doesn't really matter anymore whether they were built or not. As long as there are definitive blueprints for the turret and gun available there should not be too much of an issue implementing the KRV in War Thunder.

yeah im gonna need a source on that claim.