Jump to content

Rptd 01/Nov/2017 A6M3 is equipped with the wrong cannon


Since there was an incompleteness in the contents of the bug report I posted in the past, I will fix it and submit again.

@KnightoftheAbyss, Thank you for confirmation and advice.

https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/382873-1711121-a6m3-equipped-cannon-does-not-match-graphics-and-performance/&tab=comments#comment-7223376

 

 

1. This problem occurs in A6M3. It occurs in all game modes.

 

2. A6M3 is equipped with wrong version of cannon.
    In historical fact, the A6M3 was equipped with the  20 mm type 99 mk 1 cannon.
    However, in the game 20 mm type 99 mk2 cannon is equipped.
    The graphic is short barrel mk 1 cannon, but the data is mk 2.

 

 20 mm type 99 cannon

  Length

  • Mk 1: 1,331 mm
  • Mk 2: 1,890 mm

 

  Muzzle velocity

  • Mk 1: 600 m/s
  • Mk 2: 750 m/s


3. I checked the problem by looking at the X-ray display.

    3D graphic is mk 1 of short barrel, but data display is mk 2.

    Type 99 mk 1 The difference between cannon and mk 2 is the length of the barrel.

    Because Mk 2 is a long barrel, the muzzle velocity is fast.

  However, although the A6M3  in the game are short barrels, but muzzle velocity is fast.

 

A6M3

Spoiler

z6c6ATr.jpg

 

ruWHzrb.jpg

 

 

4. Correct cannon of A6M3 from 20 mm type 99 mk 2 cannon to mk 1.

 

Source

(1). Historical documents

 

This is the A6M3 user manual. It is a comparison of A6M3 and A6M2.
In the comparison of firearms, it is written only that it increased the magazine capacity to 100 round.
It is evidence that there was no change to mk.2.

Spoiler

jEGvbMQ.jpg

 

Ndxvv0J.jpg

Extracts from a Handling Manual on the A6M3 (Zeke), Nagoya Aeroplane Engineering Works, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. July 1942. Page 9.

JACAR (Japan Center for Asian Historical Records) Ref.A03032271200

https://www.digital.archives.go.jp/DAS/contents/pdf/S48B0501260000/0204.pdf

https://www.jacar.archives.go.jp/das/meta-en/A03032271200

 

 

According to IJN firearm performance table, Muzzle velocity is 600 m / s for mk 1, 750 m / s for mk 2.

Spoiler

DKvLEtE.jpg

 

8NrFiMh.jpg

Weapon disgorge table, Imperial Japanese Navy, Taiwan Naval Air Group, Donggang Airfield, January 1946. Page 3.

JACAR (Japan Center for Asian Historical Records) Ref.C08010604100

https://www.jacar.archives.go.jp/aj/contents/pdf/C08/C08010604100.c0660109002.01hikiwatashi_009.1141_01.pdf

https://www.jacar.archives.go.jp/das/meta-en/C08010604100

 

 

(2). Books

 

 A6M3 was equipped with the  20 mm type 99 mk 1 cannon.

Spoiler

uUmFUG3.jpg

 

xzStjsL.jpg

The Pacific War which can be understood with firearms and weapons,  Written by Pacific War Study Group, ISBN-13: 978-4537251623, Page 155

 

 

Type 99 mk 1 The difference between cannon and mk 2 is the length of the barrel. Because Mk 2 is a long barrel, the muzzle velocity is fast.

Spoiler

Kh6IjJI.jpg

 

wvF1S0f.jpg

Japanese military aircraft dictionary 1910 - 1945 Navy version, Written by Shigeru  Nohara, ISBN-13: 978-4871496544, Page 182 

 

 

Client Log

2017_10_24_12_09_36__10032.clog

Edited by *tester188
  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Senior Technical Moderator

Hello!
         Thank you for your help improving the game.  

 

Your information has been forwarded to the developers for their consideration.  

 

This thread will remain unlocked for one week (7 days) so that anyone with additional information\evidence\examples will have a place to post.  
After this time the report will remain active but will be archived.

 

It will also serve as a place where the developers will post questions for you to answer so please keep up to date here.

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • KnightoftheAbyss changed the title to Rptd 01/Nov/2017 A6M3 is equipped with the wrong cannon
  • Senior Technical Moderator

Archived

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...