Stona

Feedback thread for economy changes. February 2017

108 posts in this topic

My personal favourite:

USA P-51 - AB: 2039, RB: 6051

UK P-51 - AB 5980 (x2.9!!!), RB: 10630 (x1.8)

 

Gotta admit, these prices making no sense really make me itching, and lack of consistency, or clarification how how they're calculated sure don't make it easier to let go.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, ooooooooooooooi said:

The increase in hunter price is unfair. It's fine for the players that ahev had it for ages and can afford it, they are the ones making it OP. Us new hunter players are balanced, and we can't afford that upgarde cost. You should make repair costs proportional to the number of upgrades. Please.

 

Each installed modification increases repair price already, except ammo belts, bomb/rocket pylons and crew replacement (they have reload costs instead).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW, where is Flakpanzer I Gepard,its not listed in the table, only Gepard? Will it be affected by the changes?

This is GOLD. Previous post was discarded, I asked why Flakpnzr I Gepard takes 21K SL in AB to repair.... this post was a follow up question. So much about acknowledging the problem at at hand... I have to wait 21 DAYS to play Gepard again...

BTW, will you refund lions or time wasted if this is a bug?

Edited by wisielec
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So have they actually finalized the new repair cost? (where is the list?) The costs now are still different then the list at the start of the thread.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is kinda unbelievable that I'm the first to post it, but whats with the Hunter? 

Currently, only missing air-frame, my repair cost is 52k SL. That's simply not ok. In a decent game i can get 3-4 kills before i die, and then the Tu4s will bomb the airfield. 

End results? -2k SL for 3 kills. And that's with a prem account. I cant even begin to imagine what playing the Hunter feels like on a standard account. 

Please, put it back as it was before the update, otherwise allied teams in general are doomed to fail 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay what's up with the Hunter? I don't mind paying more because it is good however.. my problem comes with the mig 17... if piloted by a skilled player its better than the Hunter and yet there is a 37k (when spaded) increase for Hunter pilots. it makes flying the hunter pointless because even if you have a great game with 3 kills and then get one shot by a tu 4 or outrun by a mig 15 bis you lose a significant chunk of your money. if you're going to make one top tier jet 55k to repair why would you not then increase its competitor to the same cost? Its got to the point where i hardly ever see hunters anymore which means all i see are the tu 4's one shotting planes while destroying every base. The mig 17 was added to counter the hunter (even though the mig 15 bis is the perfect rival) but now no one wants to play the hunter? lol have fun allied teams getting rekt by migs and TU-4's.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally feel that making top tier SPAA in AB to 20K SL + was a very bad idea. Now planes are becoming more rampant in tank arcade (most commonly at high BR (6.7 onward)). Mainly because players do not wish to take top tier SPAA because they don't want to risk losing 20K SL by getting killed too early (too early as in too few or no kills) whether by planes (because it can happen) or most likely by camping tanks. But in RB, they are dirt cheep. EG: Gepard is only 810 SL repair in RB. That's right, 810 SL, and SPAA in RB is common, because they are cheep both in SP and SL. And they are good on the battlefield for scouting and providing anti-air cover, and best of all, flanking and spanking. Sure, the person who plays the other game might say: "Quit playing arcade and play realistic". Sure, but there are times I want to play with my friends who prefer arcade over realistic for various reasons, and I still want to use my SPAA, again, for various reasons. But I don't want to get punished for using them because of a high repair cost. Another silly argument: "Do they force you to use expensive SPAA?" No, but it does not help when you wish to contribute to your team by providing anti-air cover in arcade, but high repair costs hold you back. The main solution is to reconsider the repair costs and tone them down. even the old 6K for the Shilka was acceptable. On the part about "Do they force you..." think of this: Imagine a person is on a diet, and his friends want to take him out to eat and get some high carb, high fat food. Sure, he knows they are not forcing him to eat bad food, but they don't help because 1: The food would taste good, and 2: They would have a good time. But at who's expense? His diet, and his attempt at getting a healthy lifestyle becomes much harder. Therefore, I really feel this should be reconsidered because I want a challenge when going into an air battle in arcade, not killing fish (tanks) in a barrel (no AA defense). And with people complaining about planes in arcade for good reason, the high repair costs for top tier SPAA does not help anyone.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.