Fallenkezef

Respected Foes

141 posts in this topic

To my knowledge, there were no SS combat or police troops in North Africa.

Only some administrative personnel, amongst them propaganda troops.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SS are vastly overated and used as a German "boogieman" and general scapegoat.

 

The majority of warcrimes against non-Jewish civilians on the Eastern front where committed by regular Wehrmacht. Mostly due to the anti-slav propoganda.

 

Afrika Korps did not commit warcrimes bescausr there was no SS. Afrika Korps did not commit warcrimes becausr the local population stayed neutral (no partisan actions) and neither side where fed a diet if propoganda about how the other guy was sub-human.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fallenkezef said:

SS are vastly overated and used as a German "boogieman" and general scapegoat.

 

The majority of warcrimes against non-Jewish civilians on the Eastern front where committed by regular Wehrmacht. Mostly due to the anti-slav propoganda.

 

Afrika Korps did not commit warcrimes bescausr there was no SS. Afrika Korps did not commit warcrimes becausr the local population stayed neutral (no partisan actions) and neither side where fed a diet if propoganda about how the other guy was sub-human.

yeah i guess some people that, for example today, say "i wouldnt have done that" don't know or dont want to believe how effective both propanda and partisan actions etc. can be... it's not too much different from the refugee scare/Muslim scare currently sweeping over the western world... or the "worries" about the japanese citizens of the US during WWII...

 

and for a Soldier that's even worse... did that old man right now really only want to help you when he asked if he could help you with the car or did he want to place some timed explosives on it? And don't the guys all say that these slavs are ready to backstab you any time? And what was that story about the 3 Panzergrenadiers from the other unit that went to a Village to ask for direction and never returned?

 

I can see how easily it can end up with a "better safe than sorry" approach for Soldiers... especially for those that already were under the receiving end of partisan attacks... you wouldnt like having 3 of your 10 AT-Guns blow up due to sabotage while facing a soviet assault...

Edited by RohmMohc
3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fallenkezef said:

The anti-Italian thing is down to Churchill to be honest.

It's true, but Churchill represented the whole Great Britain so he's behavior conditioned the entire population, creating false myths extremely difficult to remove.

 

46 minutes ago, Stahlvormund101 said:

To my knowledge, there were no SS combat or police troops in North Africa.

No, only some Blackshirts, and they were not even remotely comparable to their german colleagues, the SS, in terms of fanatism and cruelty. What i want to say is that the Germans are not particularly interested in the North Africa Theatre, so no SS had to be sent there and the war could had been fight with... ''good manners'', if such a thing can be said about war...

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, RohmMohc said:

yeah i guess some people that, for example today, say "i wouldnt have done that" don't know or dont want to believe how effective both propanda and partisan actions etc. can be... it's not too much different from the refugee scare/Muslim scare currently sweeping over the western world... or the "worries" about the japanese citizens of the US during WWII...

 

and for a Soldier that's even worse... did that old man right now really only want to help you when he asked if he could help you with the car or did he want to place some timed explosives on it? And don't the guys all say that these slavs are ready to backstab you any time? And what was that story about the 3 Panzergrenadiers from the other unit that went to a Village to ask for direction and never returned?

 

It can see how easily it can end up with a "better safe than sorry" approach for Soldiers... especially for those that already were under the receiving end of partisan attacks... you wouldnt like having 3 of your 10 AT-Guns blow up due to sabotage while facing a soviet assault...

 

Yup and add to that a military heirarchy that actively supports and encourages you to lash out at civilians.

 

I wont condone what happened in WW2, but from a pyschological view it's understandable.

 

British and Americans acted in a similat (if much smaller scale) fashion in Aden and Vietnam

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

o my knowledge, there were no SS combat or police troops in North Africa.

Only some administrative personnel, amongst them propaganda troops.

 

Einsatzkommando Tunis was quite active and cooperated with Rommel and Italian administration in killing of Jews.

Edited by Ulatersk
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Ulatersk said:

 

Einsatzkommando Tunis was quite active and cooperated with Rommel and Italian administration in killing of Jews.

Really? This evaded my research so far. Got a link so I can read up?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Really? This evaded my research so far. Got a link so I can read up?

 

There was some Pogroming when Afrika Korps caputred Benghazi.

 

Einsatzgruppe also advised and helped build concentration camps in cooperation with Italian administration for Lybian and Tunisian Jews, afaik with up to 10000 jews interred, some were controlled by Germans, some by Italians.

 

When it comes to direct war crimes, they killed quite a few hundred PoWs from  the Jewish Brigade they captured. Such warcrimes were also universal, with NZ troops being mentioned quite a few timeskilling both italian and german pows.

 

 

Maurice M. Romani wrote a good book about the fate of lybian jews, and Mallmann and Cuppers wrote epxlicitly about the death squads in North Africa and the plan to destroy the jewish population in Palestine.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Ulatersk
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 23/01/2017 at 5:34 AM, Fallenkezef said:

The majority of warcrimes against non-Jewish civilians on the Eastern front where committed by regular Wehrmacht. Mostly due to the anti-slav propoganda.

That and the fact that Field-Marshall Erich Von Manstein made looting and pillaging the official occupation policy for the Wehrmacht....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Been_Benuane said:

That and the fact that Field-Marshall Erich Von Manstein made looting and pillaging the official occupation policy for the Wehrmacht....

It should be noted that this itself was an order to von Manstein.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hm... Well Hungary didn't fight against the Allies directly (aside from our fighter pilots), but since they were a foe of Hungary... I say General Dwight D. "Ike" Eisenhower. As far as I know he really cared about his troops - unlike Patton - that's very respectful in my opinion. As for the Russians... Sadly I can't say anyone who I might respect. Maybe the supply troops who gave food to the starving civilians.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems everyone knows Fallschirmjäger was most honourable . . . so how about whose best??

 

in order of best performance to worst performance Western Front:

 

94th Infantry Division (Wehrmacht)

4th Fallschirmjäger-Division

16th Panzer Division (Wehrmacht)

11th Panzer Division (Wehrmacht)

1st Fallschirm-Panzer Division Hermann Göring

US 1st Armored Division

US 88th Infantry Division

362nd Infantry Division (Wehrmacht)
65th Infantry Division (Wehrmacht)
German 3rd Motorized Infantry Division - 3. Infanterie-Division (mot.)

XIII SS-Panzer Corps

15th Panzergrenadier Division (Wehrmacht)

British 5th Infantry Division

US 85th Infantry Division

Panzer Lehr Division

US 101st Airborne Division

British 1st Infantry Division

US XII Corps

US 3rd Infantry Division

British 46th Infantry Division

US 34th Infantry Division

US 45th Infantry Division

British 7th Armored Division

US 4th Armored Division

US XX Corps

British 56th Infantry Division

 

TLDR: Germany >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> USA >>>> British

Edited by uMad_ComRad
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What are people's thoughts on the fighting power of Japanese infantry. Did they ever get to use assault rifles like Germany and Brittan did? EG STG44 and Bren?

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Assault rifles? no.

 

They did have machine guns similar in performance (and aesthetic) to the Brent though with the type 96 and type 99.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, fufubear said:

Assault rifles? no.

 

They did have machine guns similar in performance (and aesthetic) to the Brent though with the type 96 and type 99.

Do you know if their SMG'S where good? I know that the ppsh is one of the best smgs

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Afaik they were just ok.  Nothing special  (unless you are counting the last ditch versions, in that case they were crap like all last ditch weapons).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.